Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Adams v. Hormel Foods Corp., 752 N.W.2d 518.

61 citing documents.

In the Matter of: Sarah Rose Vasquez on behalf of Minor Child v. Destiny Marie Rodriguez Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Mack Layman Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But the “mere fact that a party declares a judge partial does not in itself generate a reasonable question as to the judge’s impartiality.” (quotation omitted); (stating that appellate courts presume that “a judge has discharged her duties properly”).
In the Marriage of: Kimberly Ann Young v. Charles Wayne Young, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In re the marriage of: Erica Faith Haines v. Joshua Isaac Haines Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Michael Tillman Minn. 2026
“[W]e presume that a judge has discharged her duties properly.”
In Re the Marriage of: Sarah Lynne Douglass v. Joshua Gary Olson, County of Clay, Intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Olson asserts, in a conclusory way, that the district court’s non-enforcement of the temporary order “demonstrates judicial bias.” It may be presumed that “a judge has discharged her duties properly.”
State of Minnesota v. Zachariah Christopher Whitehead Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 518, 522 (Minn. 2008).
In Re the Custody of MIVB; Dustin Allen Basting v. Heather Mae Grehn Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Finally, while father alleges that the district court erred in disregarding his “reasonable arguments,” a mere adverse ruling is not proof of bias, and we presume that a district court judge “has discharged her duties properly,”
In Re the Marriage of: Erica Leigh Riehm v. Harold Andrew Riehm Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Appellate courts presume a district court discharges its duties “properly,” and we do not infer bias from adverse rulings
Sarah Nicole Belich and on Behalf of Minor Child(ren) v. Bradley Thomas Belich Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Quenton Tyrone Williams Minn. Ct. App. 2026
But “adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias .” d 518, 522 (Minn. 2008).
In the Matter of the Ronald E. Roehrs Trust Dated August 9, 1999 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In Re the Custody of J. K. S Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts presume that a district court judge “has discharged her duties properly.”
Walter Smith v. Eric A. Johnson, et al., Steven Scott Properties Management Minn. Ct. App. 2025
And “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias.”
In the Marriage of: Kimberly Ann Young v. Charles Wayne Young, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts presume that a district court judge “has discharged her duties properly.”
In the Marriage of: Elizabeth Doree Hanson v. Todd David Hanson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
She asks us to “take action in regard to [the judge’s] improper handling of [the] case” and to ensure that the judge be “completely removed from any future proceedings in regard to [wife].” We presume that district court judges properly discharge all judicial duties, and will not impute bias from adverse rulings or critical remarks, Byers v. Comm’r of Revenue
State of Minnesota v. Mervel George Jones, III Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Matter of: Anthony Michael Kautz v. Sarah Beth Moore, Susan and Randy Kautz, Sherri Kerpan, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Jaguar Communications, LLC (A25-0090) v. Daniel Petsinger (A25-0025) Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Charles Ward, et al v. Ward Family, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts presume that a district court judge “has discharged her duties properly.” Hannon v. State
In re the Trust of the Thomas Karakash Family Trust and the Ann Karakash Family Trust Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Estate of Lillian Clara Wennes, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
But “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias.”
Valerie Steiner v. Campbell Property Management Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Lydia Louise Monahan v. MN Department of Human Services, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Kyle Jacob Kocurek Minn. Ct. App. 2025
However, just as we presume district court judges discharge their duties properly, we also presume that—absent proof to the contrary — defense counsel has properly discharged their ethical duties, both to their clients and to the court.
Kryzta Ellyzabeth-Marie Martinez v. Zhana Jeanette Gunderson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Donald J Brown v. John Thomas Almeida, Erin Mari Almeida Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Jonathan Deloye Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Appellate courts presume that the district court “judge has discharged her duties properly.”
In re the Marriage of: Towobola Abimbola Oladejo v. Olanrewaju Muideen Oladejo Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In Re the Custody of: B. G. F.; Matthew Ryan Foede v. Courtney Ann-Nicole Vaughn, County of Sherburne, … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Samuel Morton Post, III Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“[B]ias must be proved in light of the record as a whole” and “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias.” .
Larry Nettles v. MPLP West St Paul 1 LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Susan Patricia Evans v. Aaron Lee Couch Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Heidi Ann Collins v. Angel Marie Morgan Below, Brandon Lee St. George Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Kristopher Lee Roybal v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Previous adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias.”
Freweini Sium v. Eric Rutherford Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Appellate courts presume that a district court judge “has discharged her duties properly.” Hannon v. State
State of Minnesota v. Trever Joseph Palodichuk Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Terance Simmons v. Judge Jamie L. Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: James Allen Martin Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Hannon v. State , (noting that “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial bias”).
In the Matter of the Children of: S. L. L. and M. J. T., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Craig David Halicki v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Joshua Raymond Armendariz v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(explaining that judicial-bias claims not raised on direct appeal after conviction are Knaffla-barred).
In re the Marriage of: Jacinda Eve Mills v. Joshua James Mills Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota v. Tyreese Eugene Roberson Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Rather, the bias must be proved in light of the record as a whole.” Hannon v. State , (citation omitted).
Nicholas David Wivinus v. Nicole Lynette Nelson Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kevin Terrance Hannon, Minn. 2021
Hannon v. State (Hannon III)
State of Minnesota v. Lindsey Damien Mitchell Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Further, “adverse rulings by themselves do no t demonstrate judicial bias.”
State of Minnesota v. Vance Diwayne Laster, Sr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
As to Laster’s argument that the sentencing judge was biased, “[p]revious adverse rulings by themselves do not demonstrate judicial basis.”
State of Minnesota v. Josi Ann Adelman Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Prince Lashone Holt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
We “presume that a judge has discharged her duties properly.” Hannon v. State