Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Day Masonry v. Independent School District 347, 781 N.W.2d 321.
- Ricky Lee McDeid, (A25-2082) v. Nancy Johnston, CEO/Director, Minnesota Sex Offender Program, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- City of Jackson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Mark Lukens, et al., Respondents,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
347, (stating that a party may on appeal “stress any sound reason for affirmance” (quotation omitted)).
- Fitness International, LLC v. City Center Ventures, LLC 9 N.W.3d 526 Minn. 2024
- Fitness International, LLC v. City Center Ventures, LLC 9 N.W.3d 526 Minn. 2024
- Jhonathan J. Robinson v. Robert R. Amos Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Jhonathan J. Robinson v. Robert R. Amos Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. K. and A. S., Parents 9 N.W.3d 174 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-
Doug Hoskin v. Josh Krsnak
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
347, ) (“We have held that respondents need not file a notice 6 For the purposes of appeal, we will assume without deciding that Krsnak had a “legal or equitable obligation to communicate” the omitted facts to Hoskin.
-
Paul Herlache,
Minn. 2023
347, –32 (Minn. 2010) (explaining that a respondent only needs to file a notice of review when an issue is decided adversely to the respondent).
- Emily Anick, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. R. J. and B. J. J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
Dr. Eric Ringsred, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
347, 18 (permitting a party to “stress any sound reason for affirmance” (quotation omitted)).
-
Jeffrey Rangel Perez, et al., Appellants,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
347, 7 (“[W]here a party litigated two separate grounds .
- Troy David Mack, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- William H. Davis, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Bryan Leslie Franklin, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General Keith Ellison, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
347, (quoting Penn Anthracite Mining Co. v. Clarkson Sec.
-
Perham Hospital District,
Minn. 2022
347, (explaining that a respondent must seek review “to challenge an order that the district court entered that was adverse to” that party “even where the final judgment is entirely” in the party’s favor).
- Kevin Makowski, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- City of Cambridge, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
- Daniel J. Cafferty, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- James Klingelhutz, individually and o/b/o the Klingelhutz Family Limited Partnership, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
- Jill M. Larsen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
-
Court of Appeals Thissen, J.
Minn. 2020
347, & n.6 (Minn. 2010).
- Tyler Halva, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Bradley Wingate, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Heilman v. Courtney 926 N.W.2d 387 Minn. 2019
-
Heilman v. Courtney
926 N.W.2d 387
Minn. 2019
347 , , 327 n.7 (Minn. 2010).
- Amanda Grace Visser, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
- Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLC 924 N.W.2d 619 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-
Vill. Lofts At St. Anthony Falls Ass'n v. Hous. Partners Iii-Lofts LLC
924 N.W.2d 619
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
347 , , 325 (Minn. 2010).
- In the Matter of the Petition of U.S. Bank National Association for a New Certificate of Title after … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
Adherent Laboratories, Inc., Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
347, (stating that when a party argues two grounds for relief and the district court’s decision is based on only one, the party can “stress any sound reason for affirmance” on appeal even if not the one relied on by the district court); see also SCI Minn. Funeral Servs., 14 Inc. v. Washburn -McRea
- Misty Jensen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- Buskey v. Am. Legion Post 910 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2018
-
Buskey v. Am. Legion Post
910 N.W.2d 9
Minn. 2018
347 , , 334 (Minn. 2010) (acknowledging that knowledge of an agent is knowledge of the principal); Lebanon Sav.
- Scott G. Erickson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Grant Park Association, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
347, (concluding that statute of limitations barred a construction -defect claim begun in 2006 when school district was aware of leakage problem well before 2004).
- Town Center Office Plaza Association, Inc., Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Fischer Sand and Aggregate, LLP, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Troy K. Scheffler v. City of Anoka, City of Coon Rapids, Hicken, Scott, Howard & Anderson, P. A. 890 N.W.2d 437 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
Troy K. Scheffler v. City of Anoka, City of Coon Rapids, Hicken, Scott, Howard & Anderson, P. A.
890 N.W.2d 437
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
347, (a respondent on appeal may stress any sound reason for affirmance).
- Amanda Stokes-Ciochetto, Paul Brian Ciochetto and o/b/o Minor Children v. Devin James Eskeli Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Amanda Stokes-Ciochetto, Paul Brian Ciochetto and o/b/o Minor Children v. Devin James Eskeli Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 889 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2017
- Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 889 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2017