Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of the Child of S.S.W., 767 N.W.2d 723.

89 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: W. L. and R. R., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: B. C., S. L. W., Sr., C. J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: G. M. and J. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: R. S., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. L. F., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2017
6, [if] one of the enumerated child - protection grounds exists and the child needs protection or services as a result.” (quotation omitted); see Minn. Stat. § 260C.007, subd.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.T.P. and L.V.J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L.T.P. and L.V.J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. C., T. D. R., and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. C., T. D. R., and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: E. P., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: E. P., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The district court is vested with broad discretionary powers when deciding juvenile-protection 5 matters.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Welfare of A.S. 882 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Welfare of A.S. 882 N.W.2d 633 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
6 (2014); , 731-32 n. 2 (Minn.App.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. A. K. and A. L. P., Sr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: M. A. K. and A. L. P., Sr., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that “[a]n appellate court exceeds its proper scope of review when it bases its conclusions on its own interpretation of the evidence and, in effect tries the issues anew and substitutes its own findings for those of the trial judge” (quotation omitted)); see also R.D.L., d
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. v. S. and A. M., Parents … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. J. v. S. and A. M., Parents … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. P. and A. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: C. K. P. and A. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. D., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. D., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
On appeal from a CHIPS determination, this court is “bound by a very deferential standard of review.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. L. and J. D. N., Sr., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. L. and J. D. N., Sr., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
On appeal from a CHIPS determination, this court is “bound by a very deferential standard of review.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. M. J., D. A. H. and J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. M. J., D. A. H. and J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 (2014) exists and that the child “needs protection or services as a result.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. H. and R. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. H. and R. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 (2014), exists and that the child “needs protection or services as a result.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. K. and R. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. K. and R. F., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 (2014), exists and that the child “needs protection or services as a result.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. J. H., B. R. J. and R. … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. J. H., B. R. J. and R. … Minn. Ct. App. 2014
6 (2012) exists and that the child “needs protection or services as a result.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. E. L. and J. L. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. E. L. and J. L. W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
“The district court is vested with broad discretionary powers when deciding juvenile-protection matters.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. A. W. and C. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. A. W. and C. K., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of J.R.B. 805 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Welfare of J.R.B. 805 N.W.2d 895 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In arriving at a solution, the trial court is vested with broad discretionary powers....”) (quotation omitted); -30 (Minn.App.2009) (repeatedly invoking the discretion referred to in Booth in a CHIPS appeal); (stating that appellate courts “defer to the district court’s decision to terminate parental rights”); (Minn.200
In re the Welfare of M.K. 805 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
In re the Welfare of M.K. 805 N.W.2d 856 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Additionally, a finding that a child is a CHIPS cannot be based solely on an admission that one of the statute’s enumerated child-protection grounds exists; the statute also requires proof or admission “that the subject child needs protection or services as a result.” (rejecting a county’s assertion that proof of the existence of any of the enumerated child-protection grounds is sufficient to establish that a child is a CHIPS, without regard to the particular circumstances of the case or the ind

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by