Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pollard v. Crowghost, 794 N.W.2d 373.

20 citing documents.

In Re: The Paternity of a Female child, born June 26, 2024 Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Carrie Lynn Hofmann, et al v. Emily Catherine Johnson, Brandon Michael Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
6 (Minn. App. 2011); rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In Re the Marriage of: Tricia Margit Wilson v. Justin Arthur Wilson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court has broad discretion to provide for the custody of children.”
Arctos Wealth Management and Fiduciary LLC, o/b/o Irvin John Cooper, Sr. v. Kathy Jeno, aka Kathy Brown, aka … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 373, 376 (Minn. App. 2011).
In re the Marriage of: Heather Elizabeth Wray-Isquierdo v. Christian Matthew Isquierdo Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Matter of: Susan Kelly Lynn v. Christopher James Greenfield Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Matter of: Matthew Lawson Thornton v. Jessica Ortiz Bosquez Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. J. H. and M. J. M., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[A] district court has an affirmative obligation to inquire into whethe r ICWA applies to a custody determination when it has reason to believe that the child subj ect to the determination is an Indian child as defined by the act.”
Michelle M. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Elizabeth Anderson v. William Thomas Anderson, and County of Dakota, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 373, 378 (Minn. App. 2011).
In re the Matter of: Sedina Glover, Hennepin County Below v. Clement Olertey Totimeh Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Wakisha Nicole Fortwengler, n/k/a Alexa Nicole Schultz v. Chad Michael Fortwengler Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 373, 378 (Minn. App. 2011).
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A district court abuses its discretion “by making findings unsupported by the evidence or by improperly applying the law.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A.N.T. and J.W., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Criticized In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A.N.T. and J.W., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2015