DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pollard v. Crowghost, 794 N.W.2d 373.

20 citing documents.

In Re: The Paternity of a Female child, born June 26, 2024. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Carrie Lynn Hofmann, et al., petitioners, Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
6 (Minn. App. 2011); rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In Re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“A district court has broad discretion to provide for the custody of children.”
Arctos Wealth Management and Fiduciary LLC, o/b/o Irvin John Cooper, Sr., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 373, 376 (Minn. App. 2011).
In re the Marriage of: Heather Elizabeth Wray-Isquierdo, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Matter of: Susan Kelly Lynn, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A. S. v. K. C.-W. (In re C. F. N.) 923 N.W.2d 325 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re the Matter of: Matthew Lawson Thornton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. J. H. and M. J. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[A] district court has an affirmative obligation to inquire into whethe r ICWA applies to a custody determination when it has reason to believe that the child subj ect to the determination is an Indian child as defined by the act.”
Michelle M. v. Dcs, H.N. Ariz. Ct. App. Div. 1 2017
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 373, 378 (Minn. App. 2011).
In re the Matter of: Sedina Glover, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Wakisha Nicole Fortwengler, n/k/a Alexa Nicole Schultz, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 373, 378 (Minn. App. 2011).
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the Custody of: A. J. O. David Ortiz v. Sarah Judith Un Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Tamara Eileen Goemaat v. Andrew Joel Goemaat Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A district court abuses its discretion “by making findings unsupported by the evidence or by improperly applying the law.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A.N.T. and J.W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Criticized In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A.N.T. and J.W., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015