Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schmidt ex rel. P.M.S. v. Coons, 818 N.W.2d 523.

51 citing documents.

In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of: Nicole Weber and OBO Minor Child v. Jesse Weber Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In the Matter of: Nicole Weber and OBO Minor Child v. Jesse Weber Minn. Ct. App. 2026
v. Coons, -29 (Minn. 2012).
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Coons, -29 (Minn. 2012).
In the Matter of Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of: Alysia Sue Eschenbacher and On Behalf of Minor Child, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Coons, see Minn. Stat. § 518B.01, subd.
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Coons, (noting that construing the Act is an exercise of statutory interpretation).
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
v. Coons , (footnote omitted).
Evan Siljander, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of: Heidi Sue Heller, obo minor children, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Coons, -28 (Minn. 2012).
A21-0832 Minn. 2023
v. Coons, (stating that we must construe a statute as a whole, with statutory phrases interpreted in light of their context).
In the Matter of the Estate of: Mathew Joseph Tomczik, Deceased. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Coons, d 523, 528 (Minn. 2012) (construing a statute based, in part, on what was “a conspicuous absence” from that statute).
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Coons, , 529 n.6 (Minn. 2012).
State v. Alarcon 932 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 2019
State v. Alarcon 932 N.W.2d 641 Minn. 2019
v. Coons , , 527 (Minn. 2012) (quoting Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Coons , (footnote omitted).
Matter of Welfare of A. J. B. 929 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 2019
Matter of Welfare of A. J. B. 929 N.W.2d 840 Minn. 2019
v. Coons, , 527 (Minn. 2012).
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Coons, -25 (Minn. 2012).
Johnson v. Darchuks Fabrication, Inc. 926 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2019
Johnson v. Darchuks Fabrication, Inc. 926 N.W.2d 414 Minn. 2019
v. Coons , , 527 (Minn. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted) (citation omitted).
State v. Bowen 921 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 2019
State v. Bowen 921 N.W.2d 763 Minn. 2019
v. Coons , , 527 (Minn. 2012) (quoting *766 Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.
In the Matter of: Tracy Elizabeth Thompson and o/b/o Minor Child, Minn. 2018
v. Coons, (“[W]e do not examine different provisions in isolation.”).
Poehler v. Cincinnati Insurance Co. 899 N.W.2d 135 Minn. 2017
In the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Matter of: Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Coons, (footnote omitted).
In the Matter of: Lisa Marie Hessel, individually and o/b/o minor children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Coons, (holding that “an OFP may be granted only to a victim of domestic abuse” and reversing this court’s affirmance of OFP granted to child whose mother had been abused).
State v. Boecker 893 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 2017
State v. Boecker 893 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 2017
v. Coons, (quoting Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.
BMO Harris Bank, N. A., successor by merger to M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. City Center Development, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the Matter of: Tracy Elizabeth Thompson and o/b/o Minor Child v. John Patrick Schrimsher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
BMO Harris Bank, N. A., successor by merger to M&I Marshall & Ilsley Bank v. City Center Development, … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Coons, (“When interpreting statutes, we do not examine different provisions in isolation.”).
In the Matter of: Tracy Elizabeth Thompson and o/b/o Minor Child v. John Patrick Schrimsher Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Coons, d 523, 528–29 (Minn. 2012).
In the Matter of: Ashley Danielle Martin, individually and o/b/o M. M. F. and M. B. F. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Ashley Danielle Martin, individually and o/b/o M. M. F. and M. B. F. v. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Chelsea Chantel Hall and o/b/o J. B. A. v. Jamison Robert Arend Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Chelsea Chantel Hall and o/b/o J. B. A. v. Jamison Robert Arend Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of: Colleen Marie Siverling v. Dominic Andrew Bjerke Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Heather Ray Klammer v. Luke Stephen Klammer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Matter of: Heather Ray Klammer v. Luke Stephen Klammer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Coons, –25 (Minn. 2012).
In re the Matter of: Dakota County, Lorinda Elaine Floding, Below v. Darrell Ray Gillespie 866 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 2015
In re the Matter of: Dakota County, Lorinda Elaine Floding, Below v. Darrell Ray Gillespie 866 N.W.2d 905 Minn. 2015
v. Coons, (quoting Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.
JME of Monticello, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 848 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2014
JME of Monticello, Inc. v. Commissioner of Revenue 848 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2014
Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. Bergstrom 845 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 2014
Rew ex rel. T.C.B. v. Bergstrom 845 N.W.2d 764 Minn. 2014
v. Coons, compels a different conclusion.
In re Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota 838 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 2013
In re Minnesota Power for Authority to Increase Rates for Electric Service in Minnesota 838 N.W.2d 747 Minn. 2013
in the light of their context.’ ” (quoting Christensen v. Hennepin Transp.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by