Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tatro v. University of Minnesota, 816 N.W.2d 509.

23 citing documents.

Matter of the Minn. Ct. App. 2026
of Minn., d 811, 815 (Minn. App. 2011), aff’d on other grounds
A19-1878 Minn. 2021
of Minn., –40 (Minn. 1996).
In re Petition for Reinstatement of Minn. 2021
of Minn., d 509, 521 (Minn. 2012) (applying a narrowl y tailored standard when assessing speech restrictions “directly related to established professional conduct standards”).
Steve Simon, in his official capacity as Minnesota Secretary of State, Minn. 2020
Firefighters Union Local 4725 v. City of Brainerd 920 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Firefighters Union Local 4725 v. City of Brainerd 920 N.W.2d 232 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
of Minn. , , 516 (Minn. 2012).
Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Caleb Wesen, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Minn. , 6 (Minn. App. 2011), aff’d on other grounds
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. 898 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Montemayor v. Sebright Products, Inc. 898 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2017
Collegians for a Constructive Tomorrow, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
of Minn., aff’d on other grounds, see also Bd.
Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 889 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2017
Stand Up Multipositional Advantage MRI, P.A. v. American Family Insurance Company, a Wisconsin corporation, Michael Schultz, Ilya Knyazev, … 889 N.W.2d 543 Minn. 2017
of Minn., (describing the purpose of this rule as creating “effective appellate review” of the petition for review).
State of Minnesota v. Harrison William Rund Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Harrison William Rund Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Minn., (evaluating student’s Facebook threat “to stab a certain someone in the throat with a trocar”), aff’d on other grounds, d 509 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne Hensel 874 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robin Lyne Hensel 874 N.W.2d 245 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
of Minn., we refer only to the First Amendment in our analysis.
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
In re Petition for Distribution of Attorney's Fees between Stowman Law Firm, P.A., and Lori Peterson Law Firm, … 870 N.W.2d 755 Minn. 2015
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 844 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2014
State v. Garcia-Gutierrez 844 N.W.2d 519 Minn. 2014
of Minn., ("Although we have the discretion to consider additional issues, we generally will not address issues that were not specifically raised in the petition for review.").
Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc. 844 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 2014
Gieseke v. IDCA, Inc. 844 N.W.2d 210 Minn. 2014
of Minn., (stating that ‘‘[ajlthough we have the discretion to consider additional issues, we generally will not address issues that were not specifically raised in the petition for review”).