Cited by

Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes

Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , , 632 (Minn. 2012).

Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , , 632 (Minn. 2012) ; Williams v. Comm'r of Pub.

Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , , 632 (Minn. 2012).

A. “Whether the government has violated a person’s procedural due process rights is a question of law that we review de novo.” Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes

Third, we consider “the [g]overnment’s interest, including the function involved and the fiscal and administrative burdens that the additional or substitute procedural requirements would entail.” Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , 2 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted).

Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes

“Whether the government has violated a person’s procedural due proce ss rights is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo.”

review a quasi-judicial decision rendered by a city under a limited and nonintrusive standard of review.” (quotation omitted); see also Gustafson v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (stating that certiorari review of quasi-judicial decision “seeks to ‘minimize the judicial intrusion into administrative decision-making' and to ‘avoid usurpation of the executive body’s .adminis

Procedural due process requires the government to “provide an individual with notice and an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.” (quotation omitted).

Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes

Due-process challenge This court conducts a “two-step analysis to determine whether the government has violated an individual’s procedural due-process rights.”

d 627, 635 (Minn. 2012) (citing City of Moorhead v. Minn. Pub.

(alteration omitted) (quotation omitted).

Merits “[An appellate court] review[s] a quasi-judicial decision rendered by a city under a limited and nonintrusive standard of review.” d 627, 635 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted); see also Gustafson v. Comm’r of Human Servs., (referring to “limited, deferential nature of certiorari review” of quasi-judicial decision).

d 627, 632 (Minn. 2012).

d 627, 632 (Minn. 2012).

As to appellants’ due-process argument, “the basic requisites of due process [are] notice and the opportunity to be heard.” (quotation omitted).

We review a city’s quasi-judicial decision under a “limited and nonintrusive standard of review.” (quotation omitted).

Procedural due process requires the government to “provide an individual with notice and an opportunity to be heard at a 5 meaningful time and in a meaningful manner.” d 627, 632 (Minn. 2012) (quotation omitted).

4 (quotations and citations omitted).