Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes, 823 N.W.2d 627.

164 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S.T. and A.D., Parents (A22-1066) Minn. 2023
601 (Minn. 2019) (stating that “[a]t its core, due process requires that the procedures used by the government before depriving an individual of his or her ‘protected life, liberty, or property interest’ must ‘provide [that] individual with notice and an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful way’ ” (second alteration in original) ().
Suzanne Stephens v. Jon Goodwin as Trustee of the Cleone J. Goodwin Revocable Trust Agreement dated July 17, … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
d 627, 632 (Minn. 2012).
Jade Joseph Nickels v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of: S. S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , ; see also Mathews v. Eldridge , 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976) ( noting that the hallmark of procedural due process is “the opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful manner”) (quotation omitted )).
In re Approving Adverse Action Against the Cigarette/Tobacco Licenses Held by Narjis, LLC, d/b/a East Side Grocery, at … Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Nicole Monique Collins v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of: Kathryn Marie Larson, on behalf of Minor Child v. Keith Norman Marohn Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Ryan Carlson, et al v. Township of Livonia Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 627, 632 (Minn. 2012).
In re the Estate of James J. Fiorentino, Deceased Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 333 (1976).
Mary Kate Nguyen v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Megan Marie Johnson v. Richard Preston Blackwell Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Matter of: Kaitlyn Mae Steffenhagen v. Christian Castrillon Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“We conduct a two-step analysis to determine whether the government has violated an individual’s procedural due process rights.”
Mark Arnold Wadekamper v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes
Mower County Health and Human Services, April Ann Rowe v. Michael Paul Osborn Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Due process requires “an opportunity to be heard at a meaningful time and in a meaningful way.” (emphasis added).
In re Petition for Disciplinary Action against Michelle Lowney MacDonald, a Minnesota Attorney, Registration Minn. 2021
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , , 632 (Minn. 2012).
Eric Reetz, Minn. 2021
We review a quasi-judicial decision made by a municipality under a “limited and nonintrusive standard of review.” (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
In the Matter of the Cigarette/Tobacco and Gas Station licenses held by Midway University & Hamline, LLC d/b/a … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , (Minn .
Thomas Purmort v. Kaydee Lanahan Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2020
See Melchert- Dinkel, d at 23 (finding the State has a compelling interest in protecting its citizens from suicide); Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , (“There is no question that th e [government] has a compelli ng interest in ensuring the health and safety of its citizens.”); Bendorf v. Comm’r of Pub.
Katie Aase v. Megan Hamilton Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , .
In re: Request for Records by Amina Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Gary Allen Jensen v. 1985 Ferrari - plt 391-957 - VIN# ZFFUA12A9F0057043 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
were constitutionally sufficient.” (quotation omitted).
Essar Global Fund Limited v. Alice Roberts-Davis, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Mathews v. Eldridge, 424 U.S. 319, 332, 96 S. Ct. 893, 901 (1976); (noting that Minnesota courts conduct a two -step analysis identifying whether the government deprived the individual of a protected interest and then determining whether the procedures used were sufficient).
In re the Marriage of: Ayano Eto Baylor v. Christopher Gary Baylor Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes
Raymond L. Semler v. Wendy K. McGowan, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Whether the government has violated a person’s procedural due process rights is a question of law that we review de novo.” Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes
Zayna Shire, et al v. Jodi Harpstead Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In evaluating a procedural due-process claim, courts must first identify “whether the government has deprived the individual of a pr otected life, liberty, or property interest.” Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes
In Re: The Matter of the Petition for Project No. 77, Clay County Ditch No. 51-Lateral No. 3, … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
of Regents v. Roth , 408 U.S. 564, 569, 92 S. Ct. 2701, 2705 (1972); (stating that procedural due-process protections do not apply when government action might deprive a protected interest at an indeterminable future period based on unfulfilled conditions).
In re the Matter of St. Paul Area Electrical JATC Registered Apprenticeship Program and Damon Doss Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , d 627, 632 (Minn. 2012).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Edward Everett Urbanek Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Steven Michael Krause v. Minnesota Department of Corrections Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 627, 632 (Minn. 2012).
In re the Matter of: Victoria Carlson and Stephen Carlson v. Pam Wheelock, in her official capacity as … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether the government has violated a person’s procedural due process rights is a question of law that we review de 11 novo.”
ITW Food Equipment Group LLC, a/k/a Hobart v. Minnesota Plumbing Board Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes
Richard Duncan v. County of Chisago Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Appellate courts review quasi-judicial decisions, such as this one, under a “limited and nonintrusive standard of review.” Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , d 627, 635 (Minn. 2012) (quotati on omitted).
In re Applications of Enbridge Energy, Ltd. 930 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Applications of Enbridge Energy, Ltd. 930 N.W.2d 12 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , , 638 n.3 (Minn. 2012) (explaining that "mandatory-directory dichotomy is irrelevant here because this case does not involve a question about the consequences of an entity's failure to comply with the duties imposed upon it").
A18-1292 In re Applications of Enbridge Energy, Limited Partnership, for a Certificate of Need and a Routing Permit … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , , 638 n.3 (Minn. 2012) (explaining that “ mandatory-directory dichotomy is irrelevant here because this case does not involve a question about the consequences of an entity’s failure to comply with the duties imposed upon it ”).
Alissa Boehm v. Melanie Glick, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , (“[W]hile animal owners have considerable sentimental attachment to their pets, Minnesota law treats an animal like any other item of tangible pe rsonal property.”).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Lawrence Dean Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes
Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461 924 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2019
Olson v. One 1999 Lexus Mn License Plate No. 851ldv Vin: Jt6hf10u6x0079461 924 N.W.2d 594 Minn. 2019
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , , 632 (Minn. 2012) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).
In re Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing 924 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Decision to Deny the Petitions for a Contested Case Hearing 924 N.W.2d 638 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
" Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , , 632 (Minn. 2012) (quoting Mathews v. Eldridge , 424 U.S. 319 , 333, 96 S.Ct.
In the Matter of the Risk Level Determination of D. R. C Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re Minn. Living Assistance, Inc. 919 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re Minn. Living Assistance, Inc. 919 N.W.2d 87 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The supreme court rejected Baywood's argument in Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes
Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester 913 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 2018
Rochester City Lines Co. v. City of Rochester 913 N.W.2d 443 Minn. 2018
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , , 635 (Minn. 2012) (internal quotation marks omitted).
Diane Phyllis Krekelberg v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2018
To determine whether a government action violates procedural 7 due process, this court must “identify whether the government has deprived the individual of a protected life, liberty, or property interest.” d 627, 632 (Minn. 2012).
Gregory Mailand, et al v. City of West St. Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Sawh v. City of Lino Lakes , (alteration in original) (citations and quotations omitted); Staeheli v. City of St.
Julia Wang, d/b/a Orchid Massage Spa v. City of Minneapolis Minn. Ct. App. 2018