Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite A.A.A. v. Minnesota Department of Human Services, 832 N.W.2d 816.

55 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, vs David P Williams, doing business as Bear Track Outfitting … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, by its Commissioner of Transportation, vs David P Williams, doing business as Bear Track Outfitting … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In re the Estate of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, Decedent Minn. 2025
In re the Estate of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, Decedent Minn. 2025
Jeremy McNitt v. Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Jeremy McNitt v. Minnesota IT Services (MNIT) Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Lauren Elizabeth Schrock v. Richard Albert Kuhn Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(stating that “when the disjunctive ‘or’ is used, only one of the listed factual situations needs to be present in order for the provisions to be satisfied”).
In the Matter of the Appeal by Crawford House, LLC, of the Order Of License Revocation License Nos. … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Appeal by Crawford House, LLC, of the Order Of License Revocation License Nos. … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. Minn. 2024
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. Minn. 2024
In re the Estate of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Estate of: Joanne Mary Ecklund, Decedent Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of: Natasha Elizabeth Ann Isenhower v. Jeffrey Thomas Isenhower Minn. Ct. App. 2023
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., ) .
Joseph Roach, et al v. Thomas Alinder, et al., Gary Heitkamp Construction, Inc., et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Servs., (citation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of: A. J. S., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Allison Schaber v. Ramsey County, Minnesota State Retirement System, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2022
d 816, 819 (Minn. 2013).
In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Matthew Wright Minn. Ct. App. 2022
v. Minn. Dept. of Human Servs., (stating that rev iewing courts “generally defer to reasonable agency decisions”).
In the Matter of the Eligibility of Ted Johnson for MSRS General Employees Retirement Plan Coverage Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In the Matter of: Diana Murack Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Abdi v. Dep’t of Emp’t & Econ.
R e s p o n d e n t , Minn. 2021
Servs., (“[W]hen the disjunctive ‘or’ is used, only one of the listed factual situations needs to be present in order fo r the provisions to be satisf ied.”).
Broadway Child Care Center, Inc., et al v. Minnesota Department of Human Services Minn. Ct. App. 2021
v. Minn. Dep ’t. of Human Servs.
N.H., and Rebecca Lucero, Commissioner of the Minnesota Department of Human Rights-intervenor v. Anoka-Hennepin School District No. 11 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Department of Human Ser vices
In the Matter of the Application of J.M.M. Minn. 2020
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., (emphasis added).
A18-2095 A18-2159 A18-2163 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., (identifying agency interpretation as one appropriate factor to consider in interpreting ambiguous statute); Greene v. Comm’r of Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs.
Hayley Elizabeth Kytta v. Corey Strecker Minn. Ct. App. 2019
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., d 816, 819 (Minn. 2013).
Minn. 2019
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., (“When interpreting a statute we give the words and phrases of the statute their plain and ordinary meaning.”).
BFI Waste Sys. of N. Am., LLC v. Bishop 927 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
BFI Waste Sys. of N. Am., LLC v. Bishop 927 N.W.2d 314 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
823 (Minn. 2013) ("[W]hen a statute is ambiguous, we give deference to the administrative interpretation of the relevant statute by a state agency if the agency is charged with the responsibility of applying the statute on a statewide basis and its interpretation is reasonable.").
In re Qwest Corp. 918 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In re Qwest Corp. 918 N.W.2d 578 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Minn. Dep't of Human Servs ., , 823 (Minn. 2013) ("[W]hen a statute is ambiguous, we give deference to the administrative interpretation of the relevant statute by a state agency if the agency is charged with the responsibility of applying the statute on a statewide basis and its interpretation is reasonable.").
State v. Decker 916 N.W.2d 385 Minn. 2018
Verhein v. Piper 917 N.W.2d 96 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Davenia Porter v. Allina Health Systems, d/b/a United Hospital, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of: Tracy Elizabeth Thompson and o/b/o Minor Child, Minn. 2018
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs.
Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Certification as Exclusive Representative Service Employees International Union, Local 284 v. University … 902 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Determination of an Appropriate Unit & Certification as Exclusive Representative Service Employees International Union, Local 284 v. University … 902 N.W.2d 54 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., aff'd
In the Matter of the Application for Licensure of Nadeen Griepentrog 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Application for Licensure of Nadeen Griepentrog 888 N.W.2d 478 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., aff’d
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 886 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 886 N.W.2d 485 Minn. 2016
v. Minn. Dept. of Human Servs., -21 (Minn. 2013).
Valerie R. LeMaster v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC fka Green Tree Financial Servicing Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Valerie R. LeMaster v. Green Tree Servicing, LLC fka Green Tree Financial Servicing Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs.
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., (examining dictionary definitions to define “mobility” as used in Minn. Stat. § 256B.0659, subd.
State of Minnesota v. Roger Benedict Schmid 859 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Roger Benedict Schmid 859 N.W.2d 816 Minn. 2015
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs.
Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 853 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2014
Alice Ann Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 853 N.W.2d 713 Minn. 2014
v. Minn. Dep’t of Human Servs., (explaining that this court examines the language of the statute as a whole when interpreting a statute); accord Minn. Stat. § 645.16 .
Minnesota Transitions Charter School v. Commissioner of Minnesota Department of Education 844 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 2014