Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Thomas v. Engfer v. General Dynamics Advanced Information Systems, Inc., Department of Em…, 869 N.W.2d 295.

34 citing documents.

In the Matter of a Public Safety Officer Kent Michael Vnuk (Deceased). Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Fasching Ventures LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Sys., Inc., (“When a statute’s language is plain, the sole function of the courts is to enforce the statute according to its terms.”).
In the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Sys., Inc., (explaining that “ERISA is a comprehensive federal law designed to promote the interests of employees and their beneficiaries in employee benefit plans” and that ERISA “imposes participation, funding, and vesting requirements on employee benefit plans” and “sets various uniform standards, includi
Juan Cuate v. Pedro Cuate-Dominguez Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Juan Cuate v. Pedro Cuate-Dominguez Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, by Spring Valley Friends, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Housing and Redevelopment Authority of St. Cloud, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re the Matter of: Helen Chorolec, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Audrey Maria Negri, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Re: Special Education Complaint 22-027C on behalf of V.S., L.S., and G.S. from Waconia ISD 0110-01. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A22-0349 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Samiira Husein, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of V & J Farm, LLC and the Commissioner of North Fork Crow River Watershed … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Northeastern Minnesotans for Wilderness, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Fairmont Housing and Redevelopment Authority, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Sys., Inc. , Minn. Stat. § 645.16.
In the Matter of: Diana Murack. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Sys., Inc., see also Minn. Stat. § 645.18 (2020).
Svihel Vegetable Farm, Inc. v. Dep't of Emp't & Econ. Dev. 929 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 2019
Svihel Vegetable Farm, Inc. v. Dep't of Emp't & Econ. Dev. 929 N.W.2d 391 Minn. 2019
Sys., Inc. , , 300 (Minn. 2015).
In the Appeal of: SH RG For: Northstar Adoption Assistance Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jeremiah John Palmquist, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sys., Inc., (“If the statutory language is u nambiguous, [appellate courts] must enforce the plain meaning of the statute and not explore the spirit or purpose of the law.”).
Edna Ruth Albertson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sys., Inc., (stating that “generally [appellate courts] will not consider an issue raised for the first time on appeal”).
Superior Glass, Inc. v. Johnson 896 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Superior Glass, Inc. v. Johnson 896 N.W.2d 137 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A16-1504 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Nathan Tow-Arnett, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Sys., Inc. , (considering an issue for the first time on appeal partly because the parties had briefed the issue and all of the relevant facts were before the court).
Cynthia M. Leisey, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
John D. Perschbacher, Relator (A15-0619), (A15-2002) v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners, A15-619 883 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
John D. Perschbacher, Relator (A15-0619), (A15-2002) v. Freeborn County Board of Commissioners, A15-619 883 N.W.2d 637 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mohamed Yusuf, Relator v. Masterson Personnel, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 880 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mohamed Yusuf, Relator v. Masterson Personnel, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 880 N.W.2d 600 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sys., Inc., I. Suitable job assignment Under Minn. Stat. § 268.095, subd.
Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager v. American Family Mutual Insurance Group 877 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 2016
Jamy Hegseth f/k/a Jamy Jager v. American Family Mutual Insurance Group 877 N.W.2d 191 Minn. 2016
Sys., Inc., and we generally will not decide issues raised solely by an amicus.
Tammy Marie Salisbury v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tammy Marie Salisbury v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015