Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Haukos, 847 N.W.2d 270.

17 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Finest Andre Nickens Minn. Ct. App. 2026
“[A] qualifying charge may trigger the registration requirement under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 only if it is supported by probable cause .” State v. Haukos , .
State of Minnesota v. Nick Adam Schouviller Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 270, 274 n.4 (Minn. App. 2014) (explaining that, because the defendant failed to challenge probable cause until the second sentencing hearing, he waived his opportunity to supplement the information in the complaint for purposes of a probable-cause challenge).
State of Minnesota v. Eniwo Daniel Udezi Minn. Ct. App. 2025
“[A] qualifying charge may trigger the registration requirement under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 only if it is supported by probable cause.”
Chad Loran Siegel v. Drew Evans Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Kwadwo Adu Twum Minn. Ct. App. 2024
But “a qualifying charge may trigger the registration requirement under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 only if it is supported by probable cause.” State v. Haukos
Ricky Arlen Turner v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2023
The first is that “it is the judiciary ’s determination of probable cause, not the prosecutor’s bringing of a charge, that triggers the statutory basis for sex -offender registration,” and the same is so for the predatory -offender registration requirement here.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. B. G., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Martin Matthew Lange v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Bureau of Criminal Apprehension Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Lange contends, “Because the State dismissed the complaint that contained the predatory offense, the statutory requirement that Lange be ‘charged ’ with a predatory offense is not satisfied.” in which this court reiterated that “a qualifying charge may trigger the registration 6 requirement under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 only if it is supported by probable cause,” id.
Mary Kate Nguyen v. Drew Evans, Superintendent, Minnesota Bureau of Criminal Apprehension in his official capacity Minn. Ct. App. 2022
However, “a qualifying charge may trigger the registration requirement under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 only if it is supported by probable cause.” State v. Haukos , see also Lopez, d at 703 (stating that “[a] person may be charged with a crime only where there is probable cause to believe that the person is guilty ”).
Shawn Richard Burrington v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bedeau v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Lee Gerard Glaser Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A17-0222 State of Minnesota v. Emanuel Lydell Collier, and Emanuel Lydell Collier, vs. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
that triggers the statutory basis for sex-offender registration.”
State of Minnesota v. Livinus Ndubisi Ezeobi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Livinus Ndubisi Ezeobi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Richard Handsome Carter Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In State v. Haukos, we reviewed the use of acquitted charges in requiring an offender to register and clarified that “it is the judiciary’s determination of probable cause, not the prosecutor’s bringing of a charge, that triggers the statutory basis for sex- offender registration.” -73 (Minn. App. 2014).
State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger 858 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In State v. Haukos, this court affirmed the use of acquitted charges in requiring an offender to register and clarified that “it is the judiciary’s determination of probable cause, not the prosecutor’s bringing of a charge, that triggers the statutory basis for sex-offender registration.”

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by