DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Explore

Outcomes

Public record · Human review · No verdicts asserted

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Haukos, 847 N.W.2d 270.

17 citing documents.

  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
    “[A] qualifying charge may trigger the registration requirement under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 only if it is supported by probable cause .” State v. Haukos , .
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    d 270, 274 n.4 (Minn. App. 2014) (explaining that, because the defendant failed to challenge probable cause until the second sentencing hearing, he waived his opportunity to supplement the information in the complaint for purposes of a probable-cause challenge).
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
    “[A] qualifying charge may trigger the registration requirement under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 only if it is supported by probable cause.”
  • Chad Loran Siegel, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
    But “a qualifying charge may trigger the registration requirement under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 only if it is supported by probable cause.” State v. Haukos
  • Ricky Arlen Turner, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
    The first is that “it is the judiciary ’s determination of probable cause, not the prosecutor’s bringing of a charge, that triggers the statutory basis for sex -offender registration,” and the same is so for the predatory -offender registration requirement here.
  • In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. B. G., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
  • Martin Matthew Lange, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    Lange contends, “Because the State dismissed the complaint that contained the predatory offense, the statutory requirement that Lange be ‘charged ’ with a predatory offense is not satisfied.” in which this court reiterated that “a qualifying charge may trigger the registration 6 requirement under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 only if it is supported by probable cause,” id.
  • Mary Kate Nguyen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
    However, “a qualifying charge may trigger the registration requirement under Minn. Stat. § 243.166 only if it is supported by probable cause.” State v. Haukos , see also Lopez, d at 703 (stating that “[a] person may be charged with a crime only where there is probable cause to believe that the person is guilty ”).
  • Shawn Richard Burrington, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • Bedeau v. Evans 926 N.W.2d 425 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
  • , A17-0220, A17-0222 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
    that triggers the statutory basis for sex-offender registration.”
  • State of Minnesota v. Livinus Ndubisi Ezeobi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Livinus Ndubisi Ezeobi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
  • State of Minnesota v. Richard Handsome Carter Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    In State v. Haukos, we reviewed the use of acquitted charges in requiring an offender to register and clarified that “it is the judiciary’s determination of probable cause, not the prosecutor’s bringing of a charge, that triggers the statutory basis for sex- offender registration.” -73 (Minn. App. 2014).
  • State of Minnesota v. Rickford Rehmann Munger 858 N.W.2d 814 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
    In State v. Haukos, this court affirmed the use of acquitted charges in requiring an offender to register and clarified that “it is the judiciary’s determination of probable cause, not the prosecutor’s bringing of a charge, that triggers the statutory basis for sex-offender registration.”