Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Campbell, 861 N.W.2d 95.

56 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(“The erroneous admission of Spreigl evidence is harmless unless it substantially influenced the verdict.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Thao, d at 840; Griffin, d at 262
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
We assume that jurors understand and follow the instructions provided to them, and see no 15 reason to conclude that this jury did not do so.2
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Th is standard requires Ineh to “show that: (1) there was an error; (2 ) the error was plain; and (3) the error affected substantial rights.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
The district court entered a conviction on count five—one of th e two remaining first-degree offenses—and did not enter convictions on the other first-degree offense or the absence of mistake, identity, or plan.” (); see also Minn. R. Evid.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
-72 (Minn. 1965) (discussing the admission of evidence of prior crimes); (stating that Spreigl evidence is “evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts”).
Campbell v. State 916 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2018
Campbell v. State 916 N.W.2d 502 Minn. 2018
State v. Campbell , , 97-98 (Minn. 2015).
State v. Johnson 915 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 2018
State v. Johnson 915 N.W.2d 740 Minn. 2018
State v. Campbell , , 101 (Minn. 2015) ; see also Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(noting that the failure to satisfy one of the requirements under the plain-error standard “dooms the appellant’s claim”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
D E C I S I O N Challenge to Admission of T.B.’s Testimony Appellate courts “review a [d istrict] court’s decision to admit evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts for an abuse of discretion.” 1 After a contested Spreigl hearing, the district court orde red that the state could offer at trial the testimony of MSOP residents J.B.
State of Minnesota v. Cass Howard Ellingboe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tracee Chung Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cass Howard Ellingboe Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The erroneous admission of [other-crimes’] evidence is harmless unless it substantially influenced the verdict.” see also Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Tracee Chung Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(“When examining whether the probative value of Spreigl evidence outweighs its potential for unfair prejudice to a defendant, we balance the relevance of the bad acts, the risk of the evidence being used as propensity 1 Evidence of other crimes or bad acts evidence is commonly referred to as “Spreigl evidence.”
State of Minnesota v. Diamond Lee Jamal Griffin 887 N.W.2d 257 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Charles Robert Schwartz Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Charles Robert Schwartz Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Dean Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Bradley Dean Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Hobart Alvin Huffman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Hobart Alvin Huffman Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Anthony Mattox Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Marcus Anthony Mattox Minn. Ct. App. 2016
see generally State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 496-97, -73 (1965).
State of Minnesota v. Emery Scott Whitt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Robert Dornsbach Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Robert Dornsbach Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“The erroneous admission of Spreigl evidence is harmless unless it substantially influenced the verdict.”
State of Minnesota v. Emery Scott Whitt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stevie Birdie Daniels Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stevie Birdie Daniels Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Reynaldo Benitez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Reynaldo Benitez Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(citing State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, 491, ).
State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. John Everette Pierce Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Charles Robert Schwartz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Nathan Charles Robert Schwartz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(explaining that evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts is commonly known as Spreigl evidence and citing State v. Spreigl, 272 Minn. 488, ).
State of Minnesota v. Francis Allen Skinness Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Francis Allen Skinness Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terry Lynn Olson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Terry Lynn Olson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lester McHan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lester McHan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tyrone Bill Harper Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gentry Allan Needham Minn. Ct. App. 2015