Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Scott Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, 884 N.W.2d 321.

46 citing documents.

Bay & Bay Transfer Co. Inc., d/b/a Bay @ Bay Transportation, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, (quotation omitted).
Ashley Anderson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
21, 1999); Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, (“When reviewing a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, we determine whether, taking all the factual allegations in the complaint and supporting affidavits as true, the plaintiff has made a prima facie showing of personal jurisdiction.”).
Medtronic, Inc. v. Matthew Lahn, AlphaTec Spine, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Medtronic, Inc. v. Matthew Lahn, AlphaTec Spine, Inc. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Cole Robert Hooker v. David Sean Kennedy Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Timothy John Walvatne, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Cole Robert Hooker v. David Sean Kennedy Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Shawn Peters, Respondent, vs. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., a Korean Corporation, Appellant, Samsung SDI America, Inc., a ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Shawn Peters, Respondent, vs. Samsung SDI Co., Ltd., a Korean Corporation, Appellant, Samsung SDI America, Inc., a ... Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Myth Live II Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, (stating that, when reviewing a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction, appellate courts consider all facts alleged in the complaint and supporting affidavits to be true).
Tanner Lynn, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A24-1652 Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, 334–35 (Minn. 2016).
Masami Kiya, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
allows.” Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC , (quotation omitted).
Gopher Mats, LLC d/b/a Viking Mat Company, Cross-Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(quotation omitted); see also Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Deborah Jane Clapp, Respondent, vs. Dr. Lisa Sayles-Adams, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. 2025
Deborah Jane Clapp, Respondent, vs. Dr. Lisa Sayles-Adams, in her official capacity as Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. 2025
See Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, n.4 (Minn. 2016) (stating that a motion to dismiss is not converted into a motion for summary judgment where the motion seeks dismissal due to lack of jurisdiction); N. States Power Co. v. Minn. Metro.
A24-0478 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Specific personal jurisdiction focuses on “the relationship among the defendant, the forum, and the litigation, and the defendant’s suit-related conduct must create a substantial connection with the forum state such that the litigation results from alleged harms that arise out of or relate to the defendant’s contacts with the forum.” Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, (quotations and citation omitted).
Jennifer A. Hindermann, as executrix of the Estate of David K. Hindermann and as beneficiary of the Revocable … Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC , (noting that appellate courts accept factual allegations in a complaint and any supporting affidavits as true in reviewing a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction).
Deborah Jane Clapp v. Rochelle Cox, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Deborah Jane Clapp v. Rochelle Cox, in her official capacity as Interim Superintendent of Minneapolis ... Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, (stating that a plaintiff cannot rely on a general allegation of personal jurisdiction in a complaint when a defendant’s motion to dismiss is supported by specific evidence, such as an affidavit, that refutes that general allegation).
Bruce A. Rasmussen & Associates, LLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Whether personal jurisdiction exists is a question of law, which [appellate courts] review de novo.” Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, (quotation omitted).
Ingrid Jorgensen, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
15, 2015), and we review the existence of personal jurisdiction de novo, Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
In re the Marriage of: Michael Robert Jacobson, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Husky Construction, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(quotation omitted); Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Health Care Service Corporation, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In determining whether the plaintiff has met its burden to show personal jurisdiction, the district court takes “all the factual allegations in the complaint and supporting affidavits as true.” Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
The Estate of Michael T. Conneran, Jr., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, (explaining that courts must take as true the factual allegations in the complaint and supporting affidavits when determining whether the plaintiff has made a prima facie showing of the existence of personal jurisdiction).
William H. Davis, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Vincent Holdings, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
The first three factors address th e “key inquiry” of whether minimum contacts exist; the last two factors “determi ne whether jurisdiction is reasonable according to traditio nal notions of fair play and substantial justice.” Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
In re the Matter of: Brooks J. Waldron, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(subject-matter jurisdiction); Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, (personal jurisdiction).
Michael Hosting, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Michael A. Zimmer, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Snap Fitness, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Appellant has asserted improper service of process as one of the issues on this 6 D E C I S I O N “Whether personal jurisdiction exists is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC , (quotatio n omitted).
Michelle Young, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC , 26 (Minn. 2016).
Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co. 931 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 2019
Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co. 931 N.W.2d 744 Minn. 2019
The court of appeals, applying our decision in Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC , cert.
White Bear Lake Restoration Ass'n ex rel. State v. Minn. Dep't of Natural Res. 928 N.W.2d 351 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
CHS, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Appellants’ judicial economy argument is without merit because “with torts and analogous statutory claims, it is well -established that a plaintiff is not required to join all tortfeasors in a single suit.” Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC, , aff’d, see also Harrison ex rel.
Schulz v. Town of Duluth 923 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Schulz v. Town of Duluth 923 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC , , 796 (Minn. App. 2015), aff'd
Joel Wells, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Rebecca Minkoff Apparel, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The first three factors address the “key inquiry” of whether minimum contacts exist ; the last two factors “determine whether jurisdiction is reasonable according to traditional noti ons of fair play and substantial justice.” Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC
Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co. 913 N.W.2d 710 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Bandemer v. Ford Motor Co. 913 N.W.2d 710 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC , , 337-38 (Minn. 2016).
In re the Marriage of: Praveen Prabhakaran, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Whether personal jurisdiction exists is a question of law, wh ich we review de novo.” Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC , (quotation omitted), cert.
Droel, PLLC, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Rilley v. MoneyMutual, LLC , -32 (Minn. 2016) (quotations omitted).