Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brown v. State, 895 N.W.2d 612.

69 citing documents.

Johnny Hernandez Perez v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In doing so, this court reviews the “postconviction court’s legal determinations de novo , and its factual findings for clear error.” .
Prince Lashone Holt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Stanley Paul Wenell-Jack v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 612, 617 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Antonio Deandre Johnson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
A18-1962 A18-1963 Philip Lee Carlson (A18-1162, A18-1962), Virginia Marie Carlson (A18-1163, A18-1963) v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Mary Kate Nguyen v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Jackson v. State 927 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 2019
Jackson v. State 927 N.W.2d 308 Minn. 2019
Brown v. State , , 617 (Minn. 2017).
State of Minnesota v. Allen Lawrence Scarsella Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Berkeley Read Lewis v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Reed v. State 925 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 2019
Reed v. State 925 N.W.2d 11 Minn. 2019
Andersen v. State , , 422-23 (Minn. 2018) (quoting Brown v. State , , 618 (Minn. 2017) ).
State of Minnesota v. John Willard Greywind, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Brown v. State , (stating postconviction courts determine whether evidentiary hearing is required by considering facts alleged in petition as true and construing them in light most favorable to petitioner).
Crow v. State 923 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 2019
Crow v. State 923 N.W.2d 2 Minn. 2019
(quoting Brown v. State , , 617 (Minn. 2017) ); Zornes v. State , , 416 (Minn. 2017).
Richard Willmar Rapatt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A postconviction court abuses its discretion when its decision is based on an erroneous view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” (quotation omitted).
Earl Anthony Fry v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
An abuse of discretion exists if the denial of po stconviction relief is “based on an erroneous 4 view of the law or is against logic and the facts in the record.” d 612, 617 (Minn. 2017) (quotation omitted).
Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
Andersen v. State 913 N.W.2d 417 Minn. 2018
Brown v. State , , 617 (Minn. 2017) (citation omitted) (internal quotation marks omitted).