Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Daniel v. City of Minneapolis, 923 N.W.2d 637.

29 citing documents.

USS Big Lake 1 LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
d 398, 405 (Minn. 2025) (review of a rule 12.02(e) motion to dismiss is de novo); see also Daniel v. City of Minneapolis , (“Subject-matter jurisdiction is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo.”).
In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the SIRS Appeal by Best Care, LLC Minn. 2025
In the Matter of the SIRS Appeal by Best Care, LLC Minn. 2025
–91 (Minn. 2021); –51 (Minn. 2019) (holding two statutes with exclusivity provisions could be harmonized, even when they concerned the same conduct, because they addressed different resulting injuries).
Keith D Hagfors, as Trustee for the Next of Kin of Sara E Hagfors, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 637, 644 (Minn. 2019) (“Subject-matter jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo.”).
Reliant Loan Servicing, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Carlos Heard, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Carlos Heard, Appellant, vs. State of Minnesota, Respondent Minn. 2025
Allan N. Anderson, Jr., et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
If the injury is compensable under the WCA, then the WCA is the exclusive remedy and precludes “any” other liability “on account of such 11 injury.” Minn. Stat. § 176.031; (noting the exclusivity provision bars claims of personal injury to include mental impairment or physical injury which can be causally linked to the employment.).
McKinley Juner Phillips v. State of Minnesota 7 N.W.3d 577 Minn. 2024
McKinley Juner Phillips v. State of Minnesota 7 N.W.3d 577 Minn. 2024
In the absence of ambiguity, 1 “We are ‘extremely reluctant to overrule our precedent under principles of stare decisis and require a compelling reason’ before we will do so.” Kenneh v. Homeward Bound, Inc., (
Ken Martin v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, The Legal Marijuana Now Party, ... 6 N.W.3d 443 Minn. 2024
Ken Martin v. Steve Simon, Minnesota Secretary of State, The Legal Marijuana Now Party, ... 6 N.W.3d 443 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Eloisa Rubi Plancarte Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Eloisa Rubi Plancarte Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minnesota appellate courts are “extremely reluctant to overrule our precedent under principles of stare decisis and require a compelling reason before overruling a prior decision.” (quotation omitted); rev. denied (Minn. Mar.
Edgard Mariano, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis
Marlene Fearing, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, by Spring Valley Friends, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Subject-matter jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo.”
Allen Pyron, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Subject -matter jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo.”
Troy K. Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Subject-matter jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo.” Daniel v. City of Minneapolis
Allison Schaber, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“Subject-matter jurisdiction is a question of law that [appellate courts] review de novo.”
Damon Doss, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A party generally may bring claims under different statutes if the claims arise out of the same set of facts, “unless a statute provides that its remedy is exclusive.” (quotation omitted).
In re the Guardianship and Conservatorship of: Olga Z. Chorolec. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis , (stating that subject -matter jurisdiction is reviewed de novo); Poppler v. Wright Hennepin Coop.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Subj ect-matter jurisdiction is a question of law that we review de novo.”
State of Minnesota, Minn. 2021
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis , (quoting Cargill, Inc. v. Ace Am.
Assata Kenneh, Minn. 2020
Tami Conn, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Daniel v. City of Minneapolis
Jean J. Vogt, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Daniel v. City of Minneapoli s, .