Cited by

State v. Outlaw , review denied (Minn. July 15, 2008); (citing Outlaw to support a remand to supplement the sentencing record), aff’d

State v. Strobel (Strobel II)

See State v. Jones , d 224, 234-36 (Minn. 1986); aff’d, 3 In both Jones and Strobel, the appellate courts concluded that the first three factors weighed at least slightly in favor of the defendant, but nonetheless determined that the defendant’s right to a speedy trial had not been violated because the defendant did not suffer any prejudice as a result of

ry its burden of proof as to the CHS, the proper remedy is to remand the matter to give the state an opportunity “to further develop the sentencing record so that the district court can appropriately make its determination.” review denied (Minn. July 15, 2008); see also State v. Strobel, 921 aff’d

aff’d, State v. Stillday , (“[W]e will not reverse the district court’s determination of a defendant’ s criminal history score absent an abuse of discretion.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.

State v. Strobel , , aff’d, State v. 17 Stillday, (“[W]e will not reverse the district court’s determination of a defendant’ s criminal history score absent an abuse of discretion.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.

State v. Strobel , aff’d, (Strobel I); aff’d mem.

“[A] sentence based on an incorrect criminal -history score is an illegal sentence that may be corrected on direct appeal, regardless of whether the defendant objected to the score at sentencing.” n.1 (Minn. App. 2018), aff’d

to argue that he should not have a felony half point for a prior conviction for a first-time fifth-degree drug possession conviction because the state did not prove that he possessed the requisite amount of drugs to make him guilty of felony fifth-degree drug possession, rather than a gross misdemea

Of these forms of prejudice, the most serious is the last, because the inability of a defendant adequately to prepare his case skews the fairness of the entire system.” (quoting Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647, 654, 112 S. Ct. 2686, 2692 (1992)) (citations omitted), aff’d ().