Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Strobel, 932 N.W.2d 303.

68 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Jordan Antonio Urena-Muro Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“We review determinations of a defenda nt’s criminal history 9 score for abuse of discretion.” (quotation omitted), aff’d
State of Minnesota v. Jeremy Simon Garcia Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Outlaw , review denied (Minn. July 15, 2008); (citing Outlaw to support a remand to supplement the sentencing record), aff’d
State of Minnesota v. Jessica Katherine James Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Donald Albert Strobel Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Strobel (Strobel II)
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Ryan Shappell Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota v. Kenneth Freeland Jami Morrow, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
See State v. Jones , d 224, 234-36 (Minn. 1986); aff’d, 3 In both Jones and Strobel, the appellate courts concluded that the first three factors weighed at least slightly in favor of the defendant, but nonetheless determined that the defendant’s right to a speedy trial had not been violated because the defendant did not suffer any prejudice as a result of
State of Minnesota v. Roy Darnell Barron Minn. Ct. App. 2020
ry its burden of proof as to the CHS, the proper remedy is to remand the matter to give the state an opportunity “to further develop the sentencing record so that the district court can appropriately make its determination.” review denied (Minn. July 15, 2008); see also State v. Strobel, 921 aff’d
State of Minnesota v. Aaron Frances Phillips-Marrow Minn. Ct. App. 2020
aff’d, State v. Stillday , (“[W]e will not reverse the district court’s determination of a defendant’ s criminal history score absent an abuse of discretion.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Percy Leonard French Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Strobel , , aff’d, State v. 17 Stillday, (“[W]e will not reverse the district court’s determination of a defendant’ s criminal history score absent an abuse of discretion.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota v. Lukas Roy Miller Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Joshua James Dennison Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Strobel , aff’d, (Strobel I); aff’d mem.
State of Minnesota v. Natausha Rae Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[A] sentence based on an incorrect criminal -history score is an illegal sentence that may be corrected on direct appeal, regardless of whether the defendant objected to the score at sentencing.” n.1 (Minn. App. 2018), aff’d
State of Minnesota v. Moses Woods Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Donald Jay Bell Minn. Ct. App. 2020
to argue that he should not have a felony half point for a prior conviction for a first-time fifth-degree drug possession conviction because the state did not prove that he possessed the requisite amount of drugs to make him guilty of felony fifth-degree drug possession, rather than a gross misdemea
State of Minnesota v. Abner Otwoma Momanyi Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Eric Walter Braunig Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Vernon Kingbird, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Of these forms of prejudice, the most serious is the last, because the inability of a defendant adequately to prepare his case skews the fairness of the entire system.” (quoting Doggett v. United States, 505 U.S. 647, 654, 112 S. Ct. 2686, 2692 (1992)) (citations omitted), aff’d ().
Minn. 2019