Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Otto v. Comm'r Safety, 924 N.W.2d 658.

25 citing documents.

Maryam Yusuf Ahmed, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Otto v. Comm’r of Pu b. Safety, (considering a defendant’s driving outside the traffic lane and failure to signal a turn at 1:20 a.m.
State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Mangen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Mangen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-63 (Minn. App. 2019); -49 (Minn. App. 2004), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Jasmine Green Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Jasmine Green Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, d 658, 661 (Minn. App. 2019) (quotation omitted).
A24-0006 Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, d 658, 661 (Minn. App. 2019).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, -61 (Minn. App. 2019) (officer had reasonable suspicion to stop vehicle he observed drive outside traffic lane and fail to signal 100 feet before turning).
Jesse Bruce Jensen, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety , (explaining that a traffic violation committed at 1:20 a.m.
State of Minnesota v. Nancy Marie Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Nancy Marie Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, (determining that failing to signal a turn, among other grounds, provided reasonable suspicion).
Tyler Edward Connell, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, (considering 1:20 a.m.
James Kevin Obowa, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Randall Thomas Graham Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Randall Thomas Graham Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Safety, (considering 1:20 a.m.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Safety, (explaining that “[a]n admission of drinking, coupled with other indicators of intoxication, is generally sufficient” to establish probable cause).
Ronald Kenneth Maas, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Christopher Abdul-Haqq, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
, A22-0103 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Safety, (considering 1:20 a.m.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
SV AP III Riverdale Commons LLC, a Delaware limited liability company, Respondent, vs. Coon Rapids Gyms, LLC, dba … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kathleen Margaret Eileen Ochs, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Otto v. Comm’r of Public Safety, (noting that an officer needs only one objective indication of impairment to expand the scope of the stop) (citing Holtz v. Comm’r of Public Safety, ).
Garrett Thomas Cekalla, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Safety, (including bloodshot and watery eyes among indicia of a driver’s intoxication); Reeves v. Comm’r of Pub.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Safety , (“There is no constitutional or statutory requirement for police officers to info rm vehicle drivers that they may refuse to perform field sobriety tests.”).2 Due process is an amorphous concept denoting a number of substantive and procedural protections.