Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Otto v. Comm'r Safety, 924 N.W.2d 658.

25 citing documents.

Maryam Yusuf Ahmed v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Otto v. Comm’r of Pu b. Safety, (considering a defendant’s driving outside the traffic lane and failure to signal a turn at 1:20 a.m.
State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Mangen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Mangen Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-63 (Minn. App. 2019); -49 (Minn. App. 2004), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
State of Minnesota v. Jasmine Green Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Jasmine Green Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Shawna Ann Lang Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, d 658, 661 (Minn. App. 2019) (quotation omitted).
Gordon William Griebenow v. Commissioner of Public Safety (A23-1649), and State of Minnesota (A24-0006), vs. Gordon William Griebenow Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, d 658, 661 (Minn. App. 2019).
State of Minnesota v. Kelly Jenko Triebwasser Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, -61 (Minn. App. 2019) (officer had reasonable suspicion to stop vehicle he observed drive outside traffic lane and fail to signal 100 feet before turning).
Jesse Bruce Jensen v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety , (explaining that a traffic violation committed at 1:20 a.m.
State of Minnesota v. Nancy Marie Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Nancy Marie Banks Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, (determining that failing to signal a turn, among other grounds, provided reasonable suspicion).
James Kevin Obowa v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Tyler Edward Connell v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, (considering 1:20 a.m.
State of Minnesota v. Randall Thomas Graham Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Randall Thomas Graham Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Safety, (considering 1:20 a.m.
State of Minnesota v. Darcy Wayne Christianson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Safety, (explaining that “[a]n admission of drinking, coupled with other indicators of intoxication, is generally sufficient” to establish probable cause).
Ronald Kenneth Maas v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Christopher Abdul-Haqq, et al v. David LaLiberte, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Jesse Lee Helget (A20-1036) v. Commissioner of Public Safety, State of Minnesota, vs. Jesse Lee Helget (A22-0103) Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Safety, (considering 1:20 a.m.
State of Minnesota v. Nancy Jean Feltus Minn. Ct. App. 2022
SV AP III Riverdale Commons LLC, a Delaware limited liability company v. Coon Rapids Gyms, LLC, dba Xperience … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kathleen Margaret Eileen Ochs v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Otto v. Comm’r of Public Safety, (noting that an officer needs only one objective indication of impairment to expand the scope of the stop) (citing Holtz v. Comm’r of Public Safety, ).
Garrett Thomas Cekalla v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Jeffrey Lee Kapus Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Safety, (including bloodshot and watery eyes among indicia of a driver’s intoxication); Reeves v. Comm’r of Pub.
State of Minnesota v. Brian John Abrahamson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Safety , (“There is no constitutional or statutory requirement for police officers to info rm vehicle drivers that they may refuse to perform field sobriety tests.”).2 Due process is an amorphous concept denoting a number of substantive and procedural protections.