Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Moore v. City of New Brighton, 932 N.W.2d 317.

15 citing documents.

Braulio Garcia, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
FACTS On appeal from summary judgment, “we consider the undisputed facts along with any disputed facts as construed in the light most favorable to the party against whom summary judgment was granted.” rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Ashney Helleksen, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Hanson, d at 372 -373 (applying the McDonnell Douglas framework to MWA retaliation claims); Hoover, d at 548 (“A reprisal claim [under the MHRA] is analyzed under the McDonnell Douglas burden-shifting test.”); rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Troy Olds, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 317, 323-24 (Minn. App. 2019), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Sean Bruce Henry, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Amy Sweasy Tamburino, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Hanson, d at 372 (citing McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green, 411 U.S. 792 (1973) );13 rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Mark Lehnertz, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
-25 (Minn. App. 2019) (discussing breach-of-contract claims and stating that “contract breaches violate the common law”), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota Office of the Attorney General, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(referencing Minn. Stat. § 181.931, subd.
Corey Pearson v. St. Cloud Hospital, Emergency Physicians Professional Association, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Corey Pearson v. St. Cloud Hospital, Emergency Physicians Professional Association, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bill Creger v. City of Cambridge Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bill Creger v. City of Cambridge Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In a whistleblower retaliation claim, the employee first needs to present a three-element prima facie case: “(1) statutorily-protected conduct by the employee; (2) adverse employment action by the employer; and (3) a causal connection between the two.” (quoting Hubbard, d at 444), rev. denied (Minn. Oct.
Dr. Kimberly Finch, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“[A] plaintiff must show that a reasonable employee would have found the challenged action materially adverse, which in this context means it well might have dissuaded a reasonable worker from making or supporting a charge of discrimination.” Moore v. City of New Brighton , (quotation omitted) (addressing the Minnesota Whistleblower Act), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Charity Slaughter, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Oct.
Tiffany Hall, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Oct.
A. Darlene Gibson, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Oct.