Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Adoption of C.H., 554 N.W.2d 737.

23 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. L. G., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. M. L., Minn. Ct. App. 2022
(stating that when considering the effect of a relative preference on competing adoption petitions, a statutory preference does not require automatic grant of an adoption petition, but rather the “touchstone of [the court’s] analysis” remains the child’s best interests (quotation omitted)).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. H. and D. H., Commissioner of Human … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Turning to whether the district court abused its discretion in ruling appellants out, we note that “[a]doption is a creation of statute and therefore the [district] court’s authority in matters relating to adoption is limited to the authority set forth by [the Juvenile Court Act].” see Juvenile Court Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 260C.001-.637 (2020).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. D., Mother Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Before turning to these arguments, we pr ovide a brief overview of the law governing adoption proceedings in Minnesot a. “Adoption is a creation of statute and therefore the [district] court’s authority in matters relating to adoption is limited to the authority set forth by statute.” see Juvenile Court Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 260C.001-.637 (2020).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: B. L. W., M. T. L. II, and … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Adoption is a creation of statute and therefore the [district] court’s authority in matters relating to adoption is limited to the authority set forth by [the Juvenile Court Act].” see Minn. Stat. §§ 260C.001- .637 (2020) (addressing adoption of children who, like those here, are under guardianship of commissioner of human service).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: T. D. S., Commissioner of Human Services, Legal … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“Adoption is a creation of statute and therefore the [district] court’s authority in matters relating to adoption is limited to the authority set forth by [the Juvenile Court Act].” see Juvenile Court Act, Minn. Stat. §§ 260C.001-.637 (2018).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. M. F., J. G.-T. N., and … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
2(a) (2018), “ the preference is not to be applied so as to override the overall best interests of the child.”
In re the Marriage of: Kylie Jo McCuen v. Joshua William McCuen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Kylie Jo McCuen v. Joshua William McCuen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
unless [the findings are] manifestly and palpably contrary to the evidence as a whole.’” ().
In Re: the Petition of K. S. O. and M. A. O. to Adopt L. R. O. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In Re: the Petition of K. S. O. and M. A. O. to Adopt L. R. O. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re S.G. 828 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2013
In re S.G. 828 N.W.2d 118 Minn. 2013
In re K.L.B. 759 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re Klb 759 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In Re Klb 759 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In re Adoption of C.H. & A.H.
In re K.L.B. 759 N.W.2d 409 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
In re Adoption of C.H. & A.H.
In re to Adopt T.L.A. 677 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re TLA 677 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re TLA 677 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In re to Adopt T.L.A. 677 N.W.2d 428 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Matter of Welfare of DDG 558 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1997
Matter of Welfare of DDG 558 N.W.2d 481 Minn. 1997
The court of appeals reversed, concluding that Hobbs’ consent was unwritten and based on “illusory” open adoption conditions under affd