Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Shirk v. Shirk, 561 N.W.2d 519.

168 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Laurie S. Morris Hiniker a/k/a Laurie Suzette Morris, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Carolynn Bitker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
All of the cases wife relies on involve property or spousal-maintenance awards following contested hearings—not enforcement of a settlement agreement.2 “Courts favor stipulations in dissolution cases as a means of simplifying and expediting litigation, and to bring resolution to what frequently has become an acrimonious relationship between the parties.” Shirk v. Shirk
In re the Marriage of: Katherine Theresa Kleynhans, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Erin G. Aasen, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(“Courts favor stipulations in dissolution cases as a means of simp lifying and expediting litigation, and to bring resolution to what frequently has become an acrimonious relationship between the parties.”).
Marriage of Mattson v. Mattson 903 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marriage of Mattson v. Mattson 903 N.W.2d 233 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A17-0300 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Courts favor stipulations in dissolution cases as a means of simplifying and ex pediting litigation, and to bring resolution to what frequently has become an acrimonious relationship between the parties.”
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Kristin Gorney, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The district court may vacate a stipulation that “was improvidently made and in equity and goo d conscience ough t not to stand.”
In re the Marriage of: Tracy Wong Belcher, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Robert William Bessenbacher, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
n.3 (Minn. 1997) (noting linguistic and functional sim ilarities between Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Donald Wayne Leeke, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Shirk v. Shirk , review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Marriage of: Cassie Marie Birr, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Justin David Shearer v. Mandy Jane Shearer 891 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Justin David Shearer v. Mandy Jane Shearer 891 N.W.2d 72 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In re the Marriage of: Christopher John Anton v. Romona L. Sparks, f/k/a Romona L. Anton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christopher John Anton v. Romona L. Sparks, f/k/a Romona L. Anton Minn. Ct. App. 2016
2.” (holding that a stipulation merged into a judgment cannot be vacated because of incompetent counsel).
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. Curtis 887 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Christine J. Curtis v. Gregory M. Curtis 887 N.W.2d 249 Minn. 2016
the stipulation is merged into the judgment and decree and the stipulation cannot thereafter be the target of attack by a party seeking relief from the judgment and decree.”
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Darrell Hicks v. Beth Marie Hicks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Lana Michelle Kerola v. Greg William Kerola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Lana Michelle Kerola v. Greg William Kerola Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Darrell Hicks v. Beth Marie Hicks Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Marriage of: Robert Peter Crowley v. Bridget Marie Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Marriage of: Robert Peter Crowley v. Bridget Marie Meyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(noting that a stipulation between the parties “merges” into the judgment when it is adopted by the district court, and that after its adoption by the district court, the stipulation is no longer subject to 2 Removal of a PTE is available where, like here, a PTE has been appointed indefinitely
In re the Marriage of: Maria Suljic v. Ibrahim Suljic Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Maria Suljic v. Ibrahim Suljic Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Dawn Nyakundi v. Gilbert Ogamba Nyakundi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Jennifer Dawn Nyakundi v. Gilbert Ogamba Nyakundi Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(stating that “[a] party on appeal is still bound by a stipulation which it entered at trial”); -22 (Minn. 1997) (stating that once judgment is entered on a stipulation the “sole relief” from the stipulated dissolution judgment “lies in meeting the 10 requirements of Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd.
In re the Marria ge of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marria ge of: Marla Jean Knapp v. James Alan Knapp 883 N.W.2d 833 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster v. Larry Dean Foster Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Rosalyn LaRae Johnson, f/k/a Rosalyn LaRae Foster v. Larry Dean Foster Minn. Ct. App. 2016
see Minn. Stat. § 518.145, subd.
In re the Marriage of: David Lee Christensen v. Kathryn Florence Kladek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: David Lee Christensen v. Kathryn Florence Kladek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Amy Daiker Werger v. Brett Michael Werger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Amy Daiker Werger v. Brett Michael Werger Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 519, 521 (Minn. 1997).
Leon Asle Baxter v. Debra Kay Baxter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Leon Asle Baxter v. Debra Kay Baxter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Stipulated judgments in dissolution cases are “accorded the sanctity of binding contracts,” and we therefore construe a stipulation using the ordinary 1 The order was captioned “Domestic Relations Court Order.” For ease of reference, it is referred to as the DRO.
In re the Marriage of: Julie Ann Summers v. Jonathon Roger Summers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Julie Ann Summers v. Jonathon Roger Summers Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Amy Christine Olmsted, f/k/a Amy Christine Zarbok v. William Scott Zarbok Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Amy Christine Olmsted, f/k/a Amy Christine Zarbok v. William Scott Zarbok Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Those statutory bases provide the “sole relief from the judgement and decree.”
Carleen Kaye Theno, n/k/a Carleen Kaye Starkovich v. John Marvin Theno Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Carleen Kaye Theno, n/k/a Carleen Kaye Starkovich v. John Marvin Theno Minn. Ct. App. 2016
These bases provide the “sole relief from the judgment and decree.” d 519, 522 (Minn. 1997).
In re the Marriage of: Odelia Castaneda Ortega v. Selwin Ortega Romero Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Odelia Castaneda Ortega v. Selwin Ortega Romero Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“When a divorce judgment is entered pursuant to a stipulation, the stipulation merges into the judgment and decree and ‘finality becomes of central importance.’” ().
In Re the Marriage of: Susan Kay Schneider v. Michael John Schneider, Lyon County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In Re the Marriage of: Susan Kay Schneider v. Michael John Schneider, Lyon County, intervenor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
It is well settled that “[c]ourts favor stipulations in dissolution cases as a means of simplifying and expediting litigation, and to bring resolution to what frequently has become an acrimonious relationship between the parties.” d 519, 521 (Minn. 1997).

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by