Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Stillday, 646 N.W.2d 557.

90 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(reviewing calculation of criminal-history score for an abuse of discretion).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
We review the district court’s criminal-history-score determinations for an abuse of discretion, rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
16, 2012); -64 (Minn. App. 2002) (affirming admission of witness’s testimony that he heard victim shout for help in part because shout was not hearsay but “was offered to show why [witness] contacted the police”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Danny Hamilton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In re the Matter of: Mikayla Lee Swanson, and on Behalf of Minor Children, petitioner, Respondent, vs. Edward … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-64 (Minn. App. 2002), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
801(c) (defining hearsay); -64 (Minn. App. 2002) (stating that an out-of-court statement offered to show why a listener called the police was not hearsay), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
g., Franks, d at 76 (underlying conduct for stalking conviction was writing vaguely threatening letters, but defendant had previously threatened to kill victim while dragg ing her around house looking for shotgun) ; State v. Mullen , ( underlying conduct included the defendant breaking victim’s window and threatening to kill her); State v. Stillday , (underly ing conduct included evidence that defendant punched victim in the face several times and caused the victim to lose consciousness); State
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
aff’d, State v. Stillday , (“[W]e will not reverse the district court’s determination of a defendant’ s criminal history score absent an abuse of discretion.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Strobel , , aff’d, State v. 17 Stillday, (“[W]e will not reverse the district court’s determination of a defendant’ s criminal history score absent an abuse of discretion.”), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Stillday , 13 review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Matter of: Margaret Patricia Fagre, and o/b/o minor children, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Stillday , –64 (Minn. App. 2002) (noting that statements neither offered to prove the truth of the matter nor assert a fact are not hearsay), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“[W]e will not reverse a district court’s determin ation of a defendant’s criminal-history score absent an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
11 review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, vs. Nyla Tomeka Murrell-French, Appellant. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
A19-0270 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
A19-0218 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
A18-1655 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[W]e will not reverse th e district court’s determination of a defendant’s c riminal history score absent an abuse of discretion.” State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 557, 561 (Minn. App. 2002), review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Stillday , review denied (Minn. Aug.
A17-1510 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State v. Oreskovich 915 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Oreskovich 915 N.W.2d 920 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
While a district court's determination of a defendant's criminal-history score will not be reversed absent an abuse of discretion, State v. Stillday , , 561 (Minn. App. 2002), we interpret the sentencing guidelines de novo and "apply the rules of statutory construction to our interpretation of the sentencing guidelines," State v. Campbell , , 4 (Minn. 2012).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review 1 Taylor did not challenge his criminal -history score in the district court.
State v. Edwards 900 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Edwards 900 N.W.2d 722 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Joseph Milton Barnes, petitioner Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by