Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Matter of Jasmer, 447 N.W.2d 192.

23 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Elakie Fale Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Elakie Fale Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A criminal conviction is not a prerequisite to commitment as MI&D.
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Sherman Kerall Ratliff. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
1 (2022 ), which requires that a person act “with intent to commit a crime.” An action may be “equally dangerous to the public” regardless of whether the person “had an intention or capacity to cause harm” or “even to recognize its potential for causing serious harm.”
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Elakie Fale. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“Conviction of a crime is not a prerequisite to commitment as mentally ill and dangerous to the public.”
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Ingram Oyugi Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Ingram Oyugi Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Glenn Lee Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Glenn Lee Burton Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“Conviction of a crime is not a prerequisite to commitment as mentally ill and dangerous to the public.”
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Jestin Erickson Ledlum. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
at 530-31; see also In re Jasmer , (noting that overt-act requirement is satisfied if act is “capable of causing physical harm”).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Harry Denton Lewis. Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re Jasmer , -96 (Minn. 1989).
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Ahmed Kadir Minn. Ct. App. 2020
d 192, 194 -95 (Minn. 1989).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Maxim Kenneth Rhone. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Percy Jones. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 192, 195 (Minn. 1989).
In re the Commitment of: Kevin J. Strong. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Commitment of: Kevin J. Strong. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But “[c]onviction of a crime is not a prerequisite to commitment as mentally ill and dangerous to the public.”
In Re the Civil Commitment of Carroll 706 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
In Re the Civil Commitment of Carroll 706 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
195- *531 96 (Minn.1989).
Matter of Knops 536 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1995
Matter of Knops 536 N.W.2d 616 Minn. 1995
In Re Dirks 530 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
In Re Dirks 530 N.W.2d 207 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
17(b)(i); (shooting gun- towards boy from distance of 65 to 80 feet but missing him constitutes overt act causing or attempting to cause harm).
Matter of Clemons 494 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Matter of Clemons 494 N.W.2d 519 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
(patient had long history of using loaded guns to scare people, had once knocked wife senseless, and delib *521 erately and without justification aimed and fired shotgun directly at young neighbor without regard to whether he hit the boy).