Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of M.A., 408 N.W.2d 227.

25 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: C. B. B. and M. C. P., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(affirming the termination of parental rights even in the absence of any visitation), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M.C., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M.C., Parent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
In support of her argument, she cites to rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: H.S., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-36 (Minn. App. 1987), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. I. G. and O. C., C. D. … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
d 227, 235-36 (Minn. App. 1987), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: A. P., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: S. R. D. and J. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“At a minimum, ‘reasonable efforts’ requires the responsible agency to provide those services that would assist in alleviating the conditions leading to the determination of dependency.” -36 (Minn. App. 1987), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
, A21-0923 Minn. Ct. App. 2021
rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: J. R. A. and J. M. K., … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S. C. D. and H. L. D., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Efforts toward reunification must be designed to address “the problem presented,” S.Z., d at 892, and must include “real, genuine h elp to see that all things are done that might conceivably improve the circumstances of the parent and the relation ship of the parent with the child[ren].” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: B. G. and B. C., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
d 227, 235-36 (Minn. App. 1987), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: I. M. W. and R. J. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: I. M. W. and R. J. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
& n.1 (Minn. App. 1987), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: E. M. U. and W. H. H., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
to argue that the district court could not hold her civil commitment at the time of trial against her because, in her words, “the inability to return a child immediately to the parental home cannot provide the basis of terminating parental rights.” (stating that “there is no legal basis for granting termination solely because the child cannot be returned immediately to the parental home”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
(noting that although mother was successful in parenting one child, she did not possess skills necessary to deal with other child’s special needs stemming from severe behavioral problems), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
In Re Child of E.V. 634 N.W.2d 443 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
(stating case plan cannot consist of “a litany of required services that were not related to the conditions that eventually gave rise to the dependency adjudication”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In Re the Welfare of H.K. 455 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
In Re the Welfare of H.K. 455 N.W.2d 529 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
-36 (Minn.App.1987), pet.
In Re the Welfare of D.C.M. 443 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of D.C.M. 443 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 412 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of D.F.B. 412 N.W.2d 406 Minn. Ct. App. 1987