Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Tonka Tours, Inc. v. Chadima, 372 N.W.2d 723.

124 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child(ren) of: D. M. D., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Commitment of Kenney, (quoting Tonka Tours, ).
State of Minnesota v. Mya Oo Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Mya Oo Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Commitment of Kenney, (quoting Tonka Tours, ).
Cornerstone Management Services, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
A finding of fact is clearly erroneous when it is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours
Royce James Stute, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Absolute Sports Cards, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
We will not disturb the court’s findings unless they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours
Matthew Lalone v. Daniel Joseph Duerst Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Matthew Lalone v. Daniel Joseph Duerst Minn. Ct. App. 2024
A finding is clearly erroneous if it is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Kenney, d at 221; see also Tonka Tours
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: G.A.H. and S.T., Parents (A22-1065). In the Matter … Minn. 2023
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: G.A.H. and S.T., Parents (A22-1065). In the Matter … Minn. 2023
Mary Ann Karnowski v. Thomas George Wimmer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re: Guardianship of Brianna Orwig, Person Subject to Guardianship Minn. Ct. App. 2023
In re: Guardianship of Brianna Orwig, Person Subject to Guardianship Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Commitment of Kenney, (quoting Tonka Tours, ).
Mary Ann Karnowski v. Thomas George Wimmer Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Findings of fact are clearly erroneous when they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours, (citing N.S.P.
Design Innovations, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
P. 52.01 (requiring deference to a district court’s findings of fact in a civil case unless those findin gs are clearly erroneous) ; Tonka Tours, (stating that a finding is clearly erroneous when it is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole”).
A22-0545 A22-0547 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Commitment of Kenney , (quoting Tonka Tours, ).
A21-1725 Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Commitment of Kenney, (quoting Tonka Tours, ).
S. M. Hentges & Sons, Inc., Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
See Tonka Tours, Inc. v. Chadima
E Xiong, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Findings of fact are clearly erroneous when they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supporte d by the evidence as a whole.” 1 (Minn. 2021) (quoting Tonka Tours, Inc. v. Chadima , ).
In the Matter of the Civil Commitment Minn. 2021
Although our language has varied slightly, we have consistently said that findings are clearly erroneous when they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supporte d by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours, see Fletcher v. St.
A20-0072 Minn. Ct. App. 2020
A finding is clearly erroneous if it is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours
In re the Custody of: S. K. S. Christian Schut, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Tonka Tours, d 723, 728 (Minn. 1985) (stating that whether a party acted in good faith is, essentially, a credibility determination); (stating that appellate courts defer to district court credibility determinations); (Minn. A
Shawdy Kiani, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Tonka Tours, see also Minn. R. Civ.
In re the Marriage of: Barbara Ann Chadwick, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A finding of fact, whether it is express or implied, 7 is clearly erroneous when it is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” See Tonka Tours
In re the Marriage of: Jason John Helms, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A finding is clearly erroneous if it is “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours
K&S Heating, Air Conditioning & Plumbing, LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Amanda Stokes-Ciochetto, Paul Brian Ciochetto and o/b/o Minor Children v. Devin James Eskeli Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Amanda Stokes-Ciochetto, Paul Brian Ciochetto and o/b/o Minor Children v. Devin James Eskeli Minn. Ct. App. 2017
7 Determination of whether these other incidents rise to the level of harassment “necessarily involves factual findings.” See Tonka Tours, (describing the district court’s role in fact finding).
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Paul Grant Gardner v. Margaret Rose Gardner Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Findings of fact are clearly erroneous when they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Thomas Erle Tornstrom v. Jennifer Lynn Tornstrom, n/k/a Jennifer Lynn Klemenhagen 887 N.W.2d 680 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gordon Dodge v. Charlotte Stack Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gordon Dodge v. Charlotte Stack Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See Tonka Tours, (explaining that a determination of good faith requires factual findings that this court cannot make on appeal).
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A finding is “clearly erroneous” if it is manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
Medical Staff of Avera Marshall Regional Medical Center on its Own behalf and in its Representative Capacity for … 857 N.W.2d 695 Minn. 2014
Tonka Tours, (stating the common law rule that if a party does or promises to do what he is already legally obligated to do, there is insufficient consideration to support the new promise).
Stuart Co., d/b/a Century North Apartments v. Ciera Ramsey Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Stuart Co., d/b/a Century North Apartments v. Ciera Ramsey Minn. Ct. App. 2014
The district court’s findings will not be disturbed on appeal unless they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or they are not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Routson Investments, Inc. v. Andrews Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
See Tonka Tours, (stating that whether party acted in good faith is, essentially, a credibility determination); Sefkow, d at 210 (stating that appellate courts defer to district court credibility determinations).
Routson Investments, Inc. v. Andrews Properties, LLC Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Routson Investments argues that the July 2008 agreement was “temporary relief,” not a modification, and relies on Tonka Tours, to argue that there was no consideration to support the modification because appellants were already legally obligated to pay the costs of the Perkins building.
Rasmussen v. Two Harbors Fish Co. 832 N.W.2d 790 Minn. 2013
Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen 767 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Marriage of Hemmingsen v. Hemmingsen 767 N.W.2d 711 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Findings of fact are clearly erroneous when they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours
Schulz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 760 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Schulz v. Commissioner of Public Safety 760 N.W.2d 331 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Findings of fact are clearly erroneous when they are “manifestly contrary to the weight of the evidence or not reasonably supported by the evidence as a whole.” Tonka Tours
Glacial Plains Cooperative v. Lindgren 759 N.W.2d 661 Minn. Ct. App. 2009