Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Johnson v. American Family Mutual Insurance Co., 426 N.W.2d 419.
- AAA Insurance Company v. Nicole Christophersen Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- AAA Insurance Company v. Nicole Christophersen Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Progressive Preferred Insurance Company, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
- Sheila Oliver, et al., Minn. 2020
- Rodriguez v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co. 916 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
Rodriguez v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co.
916 N.W.2d 870
Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co. , , 421 (Minn. 1988).
- Garlyn, Inc., d/b/a Polzin Glass, Inc. as assignee of Wehling, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- In re the Arbitration of: Katie Altenburg o/b/o Ian Altenburg, claimant, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 887 N.W.2d 35 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Ronning v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
887 N.W.2d 35
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co., (“Underinsured motorist coverage ...
- State Farm Insurance Companies v. Jolene Wuorenma Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
State Farm Insurance Companies v. Jolene Wuorenma
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Co., more recent case law has clarified that “an arbitrator need not refrain from deciding a question simply because it is a legal question.” Gilder v. Auto- Owners Ins.
- Carmen Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 865 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 2015
- Carmen Schroeder v. Western National Mutual Insurance Co. 865 N.W.2d 66 Minn. 2015
- Fernow v. Gould 835 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 2013
- Fernow v. Gould 835 N.W.2d 8 Minn. 2013
- Fernow v. Gould 816 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Fernow v. Gould 816 N.W.2d 647 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud 813 N.W.2d 68 Minn. 2012
-
Staab v. Diocese of St. Cloud
813 N.W.2d 68
Minn. 2012
Co., (“Minnesota law has retained the concept of joint and several liability, even while embracing a comparative negligence or comparative fault doctrine.”) But this observation is incomplete.
- Garlyn, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 814 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Garlyn, Inc. v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 814 N.W.2d 709 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
- Western National Insurance Co. v. Thompson 797 N.W.2d 201 Minn. 2011
-
Western National Insurance Co. v. Thompson
797 N.W.2d 201
Minn. 2011
Co., (concluding that an arbitration panel exceeds the scope of its authority when it decides a coverage issue).
- Western National Insurance Co. v. Thompson 781 N.W.2d 412 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
-
Western National Insurance Co. v. Thompson
781 N.W.2d 412
Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Co., (holding that “in the area of automobile reparation, arbitrators are limited to deciding issues of fact, leaving the interpretation of the law to the courts”).
- Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Star Windshield Repair, Inc. 743 N.W.2d 329 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
-
Auto Owners Insurance Co. v. Star Windshield Repair, Inc.
743 N.W.2d 329
Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co., (holding that courts must determine legal issues in no-fault-arbitration cases).
- Neutgens v. Westfield Group 724 N.W.2d 311 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
-
Neutgens v. Westfield Group
724 N.W.2d 311
Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co., see also Weaver v. State Farm Ins.
- Gilder v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 659 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Gilder v. Auto-Owners Insurance Co. 659 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
- Regenscheid v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 636 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Regenscheid v. Farm Bureau Mutual Insurance Co. 636 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Pususta v. State Farm Insurance Companies 632 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 2001
- Pususta v. State Farm Insurance Companies 632 N.W.2d 549 Minn. 2001
- Johnson v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. 627 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Johnson v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co. 627 N.W.2d 731 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
- Schons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co. 621 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 2001
-
Schons v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Co.
621 N.W.2d 743
Minn. 2001
Co., , 422 n. 1 (Minn.1988).
- Karels v. State Farm Insurance Co. 617 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Karels v. State Farm Insurance Co. 617 N.W.2d 432 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
- Weaver v. State Farm Insurance Companies 609 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2000
- Weaver v. State Farm Insurance Companies 609 N.W.2d 878 Minn. 2000
- Arbitration Between Racine v. AMCO Insurance Co. 605 N.W.2d 773 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
-
Arbitration Between Racine v. AMCO Insurance Co.
605 N.W.2d 773
Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Co., see e.g., Thomas v. Western Nat.
- Rasmussen v. Sauer 597 N.W.2d 328 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
-
Rasmussen v. Sauer
597 N.W.2d 328
Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Co., (interpretation of no-fault statutes is for district court).
- Hovland v. State Farm Insurance Companies 593 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
- Hovland v. State Farm Insurance Companies 593 N.W.2d 271 Minn. Ct. App. 1999