Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Bellikka, 490 N.W.2d 660.

20 citing documents.

Maryam Yusuf Ahmed, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(considering a police officer’s knowledge of a suspect’s history of burglary offenses among the circumstances supporting reasonable suspicion that the suspect participated in a recent burglary), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Minnesota caselaw instructs that “the fact that everyone who handled the evidence did not testify is not fatal to establishment of a chain of custody.” rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
(holding that police bulletin that suspect may have been involved in recent homicide, possessed firearms, and was wanted for questioning in Nebraska combined with officer knowledge of suspect’s criminal history of firearms-related offenses supported an investigatory stop); (holding that police knowledge of a driver’s history of burglary offenses strengthened officer’s 11 reasonable suspicion that he was involved in a recent burglary), rev. denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
While Agent Ruch did not testify, “the fact that everyone who handled the evidence did not testify is not fatal to establishment of a chain of custody.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
But “when the object of real evidence is unique and thus identifiable in court based on its distin ctive appearance, a chain of custody is not needed.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[W]hen the object of real evidence is unique and thus identifiable in court based on its distinctive appearance, a chain of custody is not needed.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Donell Holifield Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ricky Donell Holifield Minn. Ct. App. 2016
are involved.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Marie Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Lisa Marie Schmidt Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding informant’s tip that suspect may have been involved in recent homicide and possessed firearms and officer knowledge of suspect’s criminal history of firearms-related offenses supported a Terry stop); (holding police knowledge of a driver’s history of burglary offenses strengthened officer’s reasonable suspicion that he was involved in a recent burglary), review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Andrew Hondl Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Andrew Hondl Minn. Ct. App. 2015
The authentication process “may become lengthy when it demands the testimony of several witnesses.” review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas John Rossiter Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas John Rossiter Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Nov.
State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdullahi Farah 855 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Bashir Abdullahi Farah 855 N.W.2d 317 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
are involved.” review denied (Minn. Nov.