Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Pecinovsky v. AMCO Insurance Co., 613 N.W.2d 804.

30 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison v. American Petroleum Institute, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota, by its Attorney General, Keith Ellison v. American Petroleum Institute, ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Randy Dale Sixta, Appellant, vs. Lincoln County Sheriff’s Office, Respondent Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (“Courts presume that the legislature acts with full knowledge of previous statutes and existing caselaw.”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Melrose Federation of Teachers, American Federation of Teachers Local 1284, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Co., (“Courts presume that the legislature acts with full knowledge of previous statutes and existing caselaw.”), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Co., , 809 (Minn. App. 2000), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Co ., , review denied (Minn. Sept.
Troy Kenneth Scheffler, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Gary Otremba, Heidi L. Moegerle v. City of East Bethel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Gary Otremba, Heidi L. Moegerle v. City of East Bethel Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Michelle MacDonald Shimota 875 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Michelle MacDonald Shimota 875 N.W.2d 363 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. David Lee Haywood 869 N.W.2d 902 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. O'MEARA 755 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. O'MEARA 755 N.W.2d 29 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co., (holding that we presume that the legislature acts with full knowledge of existing caselaw), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Riehm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 745 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Riehm v. Commissioner of Public Safety 745 N.W.2d 869 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Co., (holding dictum not binding), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Fleming 724 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
State v. Fleming 724 N.W.2d 537 Minn. Ct. App. 2006
Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Brink v. Smith Companies Construction, Inc. 703 N.W.2d 871 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Co., (“Dicta are expressions in a court’s opinion that go beyond the facts before the court and therefore are the individual views of the author of the opinion and not binding in subsequent cases.” (quotation omitted)), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Hare v. State, Department of Human Services 666 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Hare v. State, Department of Human Services 666 N.W.2d 427 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Munoz v. Kihlgren 661 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Distinguished Munoz v. Kihlgren 661 N.W.2d 301 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., (dicta not controlling), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Soukup 656 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
State v. Soukup 656 N.W.2d 424 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Co., review denied (Minn. Sept.
Kissoondath v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 620 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Kissoondath v. United States Fire Insurance Co. 620 N.W.2d 909 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Co., revieiv denied (Minn. Sept.