Cited by

of Chiropractic Exam’rs, (explaining that “[s]ummary disposition is the administrative equivalent of summary judgment”).

of Chiropractic Exam’rs, (citing Minn. R. 1400.5500(K) (2003)).

of Chiropractic Examiners , (reviewing ALJ’s application of law to facts).

of Chiropractic Exam’rs, (explaining that “[s]ummary disposition is the administrative equivalent of summary judgment”).

of Chiropractic Exam’rs, n. 8 (Minn. 2004) (declining to decide constitutional issues presented when the case could be resolved on non-constitutional grounds)).

are: (a) in violation of co nstitutional provisions; or (b) in excess of the statutor y authority or jurisdiction of the agency; or (c) made upon unlawful procedure; or (d) affected by other error of law; or 1 “Summary disposition is the administrative [law] equivalent of summary judgment.” Pietsch v. Minn. B. of Chiropractic Exam’rs

of Chiropractic Exam’ rs

of Chiropractic Exam'rs , , 305 (Minn. 2004).

of Chiropractic Exam ’rs, (reversing summary disposition that appel lant engaged in unprofessional conduct when there was no evidence beyond mere assertions to support a conclusion that his solicitation methods were “unethical, deceptive and harmful to the public”); -95 (Minn. 1989) (reve

of Chiropractic Exam’rs, see Minn. R. 1400.5500(K) (2017).

of Chiropractic Exam’rs, (citing Minn. R. 1400.5500(K) (2014)).

of Chiropractic Exam’rs, 3 DHS contends that these claims are barred because an appeal was not perfected in a timely manner under Minn. Stat. § 256.9657, subd.

“Summary disposition is the administrative equivalent of summary judgment.” Pietsch v. Board of Chiropractic Exam’rs, (citing Minn. R. 1400.5500(K) (2003)).

of Chiropractic Examiners, , 309 n. 8 (Minn.2004) (declining to decide constitutional issues presented when the case could be resolved on non-constitutional grounds).

of Chiropractic Examiners