Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of P.J.K., 369 N.W.2d 286.

65 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. M. P., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(citation and quotation marks omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. W. and N. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. W. and T. S., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: G. W., Adjudicated Father. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(), review denied (Minn. March 8, 2019).
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: J. V. and S. V., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: A. M. H. a/k/a A. M. K. … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
But “the law secures parents’ right to custody only so long as they shall promptly recognize and discharge their corresponding obligations.” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. D. L. and G. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Welfare of K. L. W. 924 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Welfare of K. L. W. 924 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
290 (Minn. 1985) (quotation omitted).
, A18-1041 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N Under Minnesota law, courts presume “that a natural parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of a child, ” and “custody of their children should not be taken from them but f or grave and weighty reasons, ” (quotation omitted).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: S.S.H. and B.W.R., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-91 (Minn. 1985) (same regarding mental disability).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of A. G. and S. H., Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2018
–62 (Minn. 2008); –91 (Minn. 1985); In re W elfare of Children of B.M.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. B. and L. B. (Deceased), Parents Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Minnesota courts presume “that a natural parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of a child,” and “custody of their children should not be taken from them but for ‘grave and weighty reasons.’” (citation omitted); (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Jan.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: D. R. L., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(stating district court need find only one statutory termination condition to terminate parental rights).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. M. A. a/k/a I. N. and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. M. A. a/k/a I. N. and A. … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(holding that courts may look to a parent’s “actual condition” and not simply “conduct” to determine whether a parent is unfit).
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: B. A. G. and M. R. G., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: B. A. G. and M. R. G., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-91 (Minn. 1985) (affirming termination of low-intellect father’s parental rights to his special-needs children when “father could not grasp even the most basic parenting skills” and “[w]hat appearances the father has made in the children’s lives has produced trauma”)
In re the Matter of: Matthew J. Covington v. Alyssa Eckstrom, and Eileen Eckstrom, Third Party Intervenor, Dale … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Matter of: Matthew J. Covington v. Alyssa Eckstrom, and Eileen Eckstrom, Third Party Intervenor, Dale … Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Neither the supreme court’s holdings in and nor our holding in require a different conclusion.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. D. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: C. D. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2014
1(a), (b) (2012) (directing that the court “shall” order guardianship); d 717, 724 (Minn. 1998) (holding that the “termination statute does not require assessment of a child’s adoptability as part of the analysis of the child’s best interests”); (“[N]owhere in the statute is imminent adoption an element of a termination proceeding.”).
In re the Welfare of the Children of B.M. 845 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Welfare of the Children of B.M. 845 N.W.2d 558 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Parental rights should only be terminated for “grave and weighty reasons.” (quotation omitted).
In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R. 750 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of T.R. 750 N.W.2d 656 Minn. 2008
In Re the Welfare of the Children of Coats 633 N.W.2d 505 Minn. 2001
Matter of Welfare of JM 574 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1998
Matter of Welfare of JM 574 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1998
In Re the Welfare of M.P. 542 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
In Re the Welfare of M.P. 542 N.W.2d 71 Minn. Ct. App. 1996
See, ("nowhere in the [termination] statute is imminent adoption an element of a termination proceeding"); (citing P.J.K.), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In Re the Welfare of R.T.B. 492 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of R.T.B. 492 N.W.2d 1 Minn. Ct. App. 1992
In Re the Welfare of J.S. 470 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
In Re the Welfare of J.S. 470 N.W.2d 697 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
Therefore, “strict statutory factors must be met before parental rights can be terminated.”
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
In Re the Welfare of M.D.O. 462 N.W.2d 370 Minn. 1990
-291 (Minn.1985) (mental retardation); (mental illness, chemical dependency and limited intellectual functioning); (mental illness and mental retardation)
In Re the Welfare of D.C.M. 443 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of D.C.M. 443 N.W.2d 853 Minn. Ct. App. 1989
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 415 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 415 N.W.2d 879 Minn. 1987
See, e.g., J.W, supra at 794-95 (neglect); (custody); (termination).
In Re the Welfare of N.C.K. 411 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of N.C.K. 411 N.W.2d 577 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of M.G. 407 N.W.2d 118 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Welfare of J.J.L.B. 394 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.J.L.B. 394 N.W.2d 858 Minn. Ct. App. 1986
See Welfare of P.J.K., -92 (Minn.1985).
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 391 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1986
In Re the Welfare of J.W. 391 N.W.2d 791 Minn. 1986
(custody determination); (termination of parental rights under Minn.Stat.
In re K.M.T. 390 N.W.2d 371 Minn. Ct. App. 1986