Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite McIntire v. State, 458 N.W.2d 714.

71 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Dalvin Jarrell Crockett Minn. Ct. App. 2026
State of Minnesota v. Dalvin Jarrell Crockett Minn. Ct. App. 2026
n.2 (Minn. App. 1990) (stating arguments not made in appellant’s brief may not be revived in a reply brief), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Sylvester L. Zurn, individually and as beneficiary of the Sylvester L. Zurn Trust, dated December 30, 2002, et … Minn. Ct. App. 2025
v. Anda, n.2 (Minn. App. 1990), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Amanda Buxton, as trustee for the next-of-kin Tom Buxton, deceased, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
n.2 (Minn. App. 1990) (explaining that arguments not raised in the principal brief are waived on appeal) , rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See McIntire v. State , n.2 (Minn. App. 1990), rev. denied (Minn. Sept.
Maine Heights LLC, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
v. Anda, n.2 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Marriage of: James Edward Cook, II, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
v. Anda, n.2 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Michael McCabe, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The reply brief mu st be confined to new matter raised in the brief of the respondent.”); see also McIntire v. State , n.2 (Minn. App. 1990) (declining to address issues first argued in reply brief that are outside 17 the scope of the principal brief), review denied (Minn. Sept.
A16-2034 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See McIntire v. State , n.2 (Minn. App. 1990) (explaining that claims not raised in an appellant’s principal brief were waived and could not be revived by addressing them in the appel lant’s reply brief), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Sergey Alekseyevich Porada Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Sergey Alekseyevich Porada Minn. Ct. App. 2016
n.2 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Joseph Traylor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Raymond Joseph Traylor Minn. Ct. App. 2016
n.2 21 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
In re the Estate of: Bernice R. Murray aka Bernice Murray Minn. Ct. App. 2016
n.2 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Mark Thompson 873 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ryan Mark Thompson 873 N.W.2d 873 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
n.2 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Michael Frederick Schmidt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michael Frederick Schmidt v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2014
n.2 (Minn. App. 1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
William O. Bradley v. Carol M. Kelley Minn. Ct. App. 2014
n.2 (Minn. App. 1990) (stating that issues not addressed in an appellant's principal brief have been “waived and cannot be revived by addressing them in the reply brief”), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A. 842 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Hunter v. Anchor Bank, N.A. 842 N.W.2d 10 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
TC/American Monorail, Inc. v. Custom Conveyor Corp. 822 N.W.2d 812 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990) (explaining that issues not raised in principal brief cannot be revived in reply brief), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 803 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Engineering & Construction Innovations, Inc. v. L.H. Bolduc Co. 803 N.W.2d 916 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Grigsby 806 N.W.2d 101 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Hagen v. Schirmers 783 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Hagen v. Schirmers 783 N.W.2d 212 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
Thiele, d at 582 (declining to hear matters raised for first time on appeal); , 717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990) (declining to address issues first argued in reply brief), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Stockwell 770 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Stockwell 770 N.W.2d 533 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
(stating that issues not briefed are waived); , 717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990) (stating arguments not made in appellant’s brief may not be revived in a reply brief), review denied (Minn. Sept.
JEM ACRES, LLC v. Bruno 764 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
JEM ACRES, LLC v. Bruno 764 N.W.2d 77 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
3 (“The reply brief must be confined to new matter raised in the brief of the respondent.”); , 717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990) (stating that issues not addressed in an appellant’s principal brief are “waived and cannot be reviewed by addressing them in their reply brief’), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Fontaine v. Steen 759 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Fontaine v. Steen 759 N.W.2d 672 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Szarzynski v. Szarzynski 732 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Szarzynski v. Szarzynski 732 N.W.2d 285 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
(stating issues not briefed are waived); , 717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990) (noting issues not raised or argued in appellant's principal brief cannot be revived in a reply brief), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State v. Boehl 726 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
State v. Boehl 726 N.W.2d 831 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Phillips v. State 725 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Phillips v. State 725 N.W.2d 778 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
2074, 2079-80 , 48 L.Ed.2d 684 (1976); (observing that Bishop amplified Supreme Court’s holding in Roth), review denied (Minn. Sept.
TIMELINE, LLC v. Williams Holdings 3, LLC 698 N.W.2d 181 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
TIMELINE, LLC v. Williams Holdings 3, LLC 698 N.W.2d 181 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
McLaughlin v. Heikkila 697 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
McLaughlin v. Heikkila 697 N.W.2d 231 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
3; , 717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990) (issues not raised or argued in an appellant’s principal brief may not be revived in a reply brief), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Delacy Investments, Inc. v. Thurman 693 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Delacy Investments, Inc. v. Thurman 693 N.W.2d 479 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990), review denied (Minn. Sept.
Swarthout v. Mutual Service Life Insurance Co. 632 N.W.2d 741 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Braith v. Fischer 632 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Braith v. Fischer 632 N.W.2d 716 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
This alternative argument fails because appellant’s attack on Morris’s credibility appears for the first time in her reply brief, (stating issues not briefed are waived); , 717 n. 2 (Minn.App.1990) (stating arguments not made in appellant’s brief may not be revived in a reply brief), review denied (Minn. Sept.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by