Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kemp v. Kemp, 608 N.W.2d 916.

22 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Steven Edward Stwalley v. Leigh Anne Stwalley Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Peter Richard Rickmyer, Appellant, vs. Xenos Letoi Brooks, R e s pondent. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(making this observation in the context of a child-support appeal); see Minn. Stat. § 645.44, subd.
Alpha News v. City of Detroit Lakes, et al Minn. Ct. App. 2025
See, (“Because the word ‘may’ is defined as ‘permissive,’ a district court has discretion to set the effective date of a maintenance modification.”).
In re the Marriage of: Beverly Denise Kossack v. Kenneth Joseph Kossack Minn. Ct. App. 2023
see also Sinda, d at 181 (stating that an appellate court “review[s] the district court’s decisions regarding retroactivity for an abuse of discretion).
In re the Marriage of: Angela Marie Backman v. Charles Robert Backman Minn. Ct. App. 2023
This court has stated that an award of permanent spousal maintenance “does not preclude an obligor from subsequently demonstrating that a recipient has, in fact, become self-sufficient.”
In re the Marriage of: Kevin Eric Alstrin v. Allison Lynn Alstrin, Carver County Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-21 (Minn. App. 2000) (holding that a district court has the discretion to set a n effective date for modification of spousal maintenance that post-dates the filing of the motion).
In re the Marriage of: Melissa F. Feierabend v. David Feierabend, and State of Minnesota, County of St. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
In re the Marriage of: County of Isanti, Olivia Cecile Margaret Voss v. Christopher James Grecula Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(making this observa tion in the context of a child- support appeal); see Minn. Stat. § 645.44, subd.
In re the Marriage of: Ajay K. Israni v. Sonal A. Sidhwani Minn. Ct. App. 2021
(addressing this aspect of Poehls).
Deborah Lynn Nichols v. Scott Gerald Nichols Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Appellant “doubts that, in almost any instance, an award in the $300 range can be rendered unreasonable or unfair given that the dissolution decree awarded her ‘permanent’ maintenance.” But the fact that an award is deemed permanent “does not preclude an obligor from subsequently demonstrating that a recipient has, in fact, become self - sufficient.”
In re the Marriage of: Joyce Marie Peterson (A19-1163) (A19-1332) v. David Lee Peterson (A19-1163) (A19-1332) Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Jill Melisa Sinda v. Richard Joseph Sinda Minn. Ct. App. 2020
In re the Marriage of: Paul Matthias Hobday v. Mary Kay Hobday Minn. Ct. App. 2020
When determining whether a substantial change in income has occurred, making the maintenance obligation unreasonable and unfair, “the stipulation may be relevant if one party claims this change was not or could not have been anticipated.” Kemp v. Kemp
In re the Marriage of: Gregory Joseph Parnell v. Christine Melanie Parnell Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(setting forth this aspect of Poehls).
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Alyssa Aileen Rex, f/k/a Alyssa Aileen Nicoski v. Steven Edward Nicoski Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(stating that “maintenance depends on a showing of need”); (stating that “[a]bsent a demonstrated need [by a maintenance recipient, a maintenance obligor’s] continuing maintenance obligation should be terminated”).
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: Sharon Alice Gribble v. William Daniel Gribble Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Regarding the gym membership, to support his argument that the district court clearly erred by including a $50 gym membership in Sharon’s monthly expenses because the expense arose after the parties separated.
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Lee v. Lee 749 N.W.2d 51 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf 732 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
Marriage of Kampf v. Kampf 732 N.W.2d 630 Minn. Ct. App. 2007
in which the obligee’s margin account loan payment was “temporary and more in the nature of an investment.” Finally, is also misplaced.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by