Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite In Re the Welfare of A.J.C., 556 N.W.2d 616.

28 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. M. C., K. W. C. and T. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: R. J. O., J. E. J., and J. … Minn. Ct. App. 2021
court’s specific findings as clearly erroneous, but she seemingly contends that termination is not in the children’s best interests because she has a strong bond with her children and because she has a “good understanding [of] her children’s medical needs and [their] mental health needs.” While a parent’s bond with a child do es weigh in favor of reunification, we have stated that a parent’s love and desire to regain cu stody will not be enough to pr event termination where these interests of th
In re the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: L. M. B. and J. S. L. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[T]he petitioner bears the burden of overcoming the presumption that a natural parent is a fit and suitable person to be entrusted with the care of the child.” - 20 (Minn. App. 1996) (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. D. L. and G. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that a parent’s interest may not weigh against termination when the parent engaged in visitation only “sporadically”), review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of E. C. S., S. K. D., J. M. … Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Mar.
A18-1659 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(affirming termination where parent’s inability to care for child “threatens the mental and physical health” of child); (affirming termination of parental rights where “in spite of [mother’s] love for her children, [she] has failed to comply with her parental duties” due to personal problems), review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: M. J. H. and M. J. M., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(affirming termination where parent’s inability to care for child “threatens the mental and physical health” of child); (affirming termination of parental rights where “in spite of [mother’s] love fo r her children, [she] has failed to comply with her parental duties, basically due to her personal problem s of alcoholism, drug addiction, low self- esteem, and her tendency to involve herself in abusive relations
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: I. C. G. and T. A. T., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: K. B., Parent. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
W.2d 247, 251-52 (Minn. App. 2003) (rejecting parent’s argument that passivity in interacting with agency failed to support finding that termination of parental rights was in child’s best interests when findings showed parent’s conduct included continuing problems improving her parenting skills, mental health and drug abuse, and other substantial personal issues); (affirming termination of parental rights where “in spite of [mother’s] love for her children, [she] has failed to comply with her pa
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: W. J. C., III, and G. A. C., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Child of: W. J. C., III, and G. A. C., … Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See R.M.M., d at 542 (affirming termination where parent’s inability to care for child “threatens the mental and physical health” of the child); d 616, 622 (Minn. App. 1996) (affirming termination of parental rights where “in spite of [mother’s] love for her children, [she] has failed to comply with her parental duties, basically due to her personal problems of alcoholism, drug addiction, low self-esteem, and her tendency to involve herself in abusive relationshi
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. S., E. B. and H. J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: L. S., E. B. and H. J., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
(recognizing the importance of stability in a child’s life when deciding whether to terminate parental rights); d 616, 622 (Minn. App. 1996) (affirming termination when mother failed to comply with 6 her parental duties due to drug addiction and a tendency to involve herself in abusive relationships), review denied (Minn. Mar.
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In the Matter of the Welfare of the Children of: N. M. L. and E. R. L., Parents. Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(concluding that mother’s love for child and desire to regain custody were not sufficient to support reunification where she failed to demonstrate requisite parenting skills); (concluding that despite appellant’s love for and bond with her children, her inability to comply with parental duties due to alcoholism and drug addiction warranted termination), review denied (Minn. Mar.
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
In re the Welfare of the Child of J.K.T. 814 N.W.2d 76 Minn. Ct. App. 2012
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In Re the Welfare of the Child of W.L.P. 678 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
In Re the Welfare of the Child of W.L.P. 678 N.W.2d 703 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In Re the Children of Wildey 669 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Children of Wildey 669 N.W.2d 408 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In Re the Children of Vasquez 658 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
In Re the Children of Vasquez 658 N.W.2d 249 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
review denied (Minn. Mar.
In Re Welfare of MH 595 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
In Re Welfare of MH 595 N.W.2d 223 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
review denied (Minn. Mar.
Matter of Welfare of JM 574 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1998
Matter of Welfare of JM 574 N.W.2d 717 Minn. 1998
620 n. 1 (Minn.App.1996), pet.