Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Britton, 604 N.W.2d 84.

222 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Gabino Otero Labra Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stephen Anthony Reed Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Stephen Anthony Reed Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“In deciding the propriety of investigative stops, we review the events surrounding the stop and consider the totality of the circumstances in determining whether the police had a reasonable basis justifying the stop.”
State of Minnesota v. Robert Carl Thoensen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert Carl Thoensen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse 878 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse 878 N.W.2d 499 Minn. 2016
“In reviewing a district court’s determinations of the legality of a limited investigatory stop, we review questions of reasonable suspicion de novo.”
State of Minnesota v. Jayson Stanley Sam Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. James Lamar Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. James Lamar Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jayson Stanley Sam Minn. Ct. App. 2016
However, “In deciding the propriety of investigative stops, we review the events surrounding the stop and consider the totality of the circumstances in determining whether the police had a reasonable basis justifying the stop.” d 84, 87 (Minn. 2000) (emphases added).
State of Minnesota v. Charles ONeal Darby, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Charles ONeal Darby, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Appellate courts “are deferential to police officer training and experience and recognize that a trained officer can properly act on suspicion that would elude an untrained eye.” –89 (Minn. 2000).
State of Minnesota v. Ann Marie Hoyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jarrod Dwayne Miller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Jarrod Dwayne Miller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Ann Marie Hoyer Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Scott Welch Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Shuly Marambo Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Shuly Marambo Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Courts “are deferential to police officer training and experience and recognize that a trained officer can properly act on suspicion that would elude an untrained eye.” -89 (Minn. 2000).
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Scott Welch Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Appellate courts “are deferential to police officer training and experience and recognize that a trained officer can properly act on suspicion that would elude an untrained eye.” –89 (Minn. 2000).
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Jose Martin Lugo, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2016
But police officers were able to “point to something objectively supporting [their] suspicion.” (emphasis added).
Troy K. Scheffler v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Troy K. Scheffler v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rita Dolores Illi v. Commissioner of Public Safety 873 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Rita Dolores Illi v. Commissioner of Public Safety 873 N.W.2d 149 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Aamir Karmoeddien Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Aamir Karmoeddien Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Benjamin David Telschow v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Benjamin David Telschow v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In reviewing a district court’s determination on the legality of a stop, we review questions of reasonable suspicion de novo and findings of fact for clear error, “giving due weight to the inferences drawn from those facts by the district court.” (citations and quotations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Leroy Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Curtis Leroy Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Nathan Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Alexander Nathan Davis Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Patrick Ketz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Elliott Patrick Ketz Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Maurice Antwan Hegwood Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Maurice Antwan Hegwood Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Justin Steven Luedke v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Justin Steven Luedke v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John West, IV Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Joseph John West, IV Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Tyler Thomas Devries Morse Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lester Leroy Hiltz, Jr. v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Lester Leroy Hiltz, Jr. v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
James Fletcher Cameron v. Commissioner of Public Safety Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Leonard Bowman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ricardo Leonard Bowman Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“[W]holly lawful conduct might justify the suspicion that criminal activity is afoot.”

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by