Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Playle v. Commissioner of Public Safety, 439 N.W.2d 747.

31 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Safety, d 747, 748 (Minn. App. 1989).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Safety , 8 (Minn. App. 1989) (concluding presumption of reliability applied to identified restaurant employee and noting that officer identified informant after seizure) .
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Safety , (noting that there was “reason to believe the informant based his conclusion on personal observation” after the informant described the color and make of the vehicle suspected of drunk driving).
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Olson, d at 556; Marben, d at 699; Jobe, d at 922; Playle v. Comm’r of Public Safety
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Paul Robert Mix, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Walter Bakke Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Gregory Walter Bakke Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gary Zurek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gary Zurek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Safety, (stating the police had reason to believe the informant based on his personal observations).
State of Minnesota v. Darren Gregory Melges Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Darren Gregory Melges Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert Frederick Smart Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Robert Frederick Smart Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Christine Marie Tomlinson v. Commissioner of Public Safety, (A15-1424), and State of Minnesota, (A15-1431) v. Christine Marie Tomlinson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Christine Marie Tomlinson v. Commissioner of Public Safety, (A15-1424), and State of Minnesota, (A15-1431) v. Christine Marie Tomlinson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gary Zurek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Gary Zurek Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Safety, -49 (Minn. App. 1989).
State of Minnesota v. Melissa Jill Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Melissa Jill Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Safety, (concluding that a Burger King employee’s tip that a driver was drunk was sufficient to justify an investigatory stop because the employee personally observed the driver).
State of Minnesota v. Ronaldo Earl Rounds Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ronaldo Earl Rounds Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Safety, (concluding that reasonable suspicion existed for a stop when an informant, who 7 identified himself as an employee of a certain restaurant, observed a car leave the drive- through window and reported a “drunk driver”).
State of Minnesota v. Cynthia Jayne Holmes-Buscher Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Cynthia Jayne Holmes-Buscher Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Magnuson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 703 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Magnuson v. Commissioner of Public Safety 703 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Rose v. Commissioner of Public Safety 637 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Rose v. Commissioner of Public Safety 637 N.W.2d 326 Minn. Ct. App. 2001
Jobe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 609 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Jobe v. Commissioner of Public Safety 609 N.W.2d 919 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Safety, (tip *922 reliable when informant identified as employee of particular Burger King).