Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Smith, 476 N.W.2d 511.

19 citing documents.

John Mitchell Wiseman, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
In State v. Smith, unknown to the district court or the defendant, the defendant’s trial counsel “was having disciplinary problems.”
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
(holding that an officer had probable cause to arrest the defendant when “the location and defendant’s conduct were consistent with [drug] dealing”).
Herald Edward Liu, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State v. Smith , (quotation omitted) .
Aka Lawrence Fualefeh, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Mohamed Adel Alwan, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
A “reasonable probability” of a different outcome means a probability “sufficient to underm ine confidence in the outcome.” State v. Smith , (M inn.
Douglas Edwin Minor, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(stating that “[i]f counsel has never been a lawyer, never been admitted to th e bar, persuasive author ity holds that this creates a per se Sixth Amendment violation”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Likewise, in State v. Smith, the supreme court held that police had probable cause to arrest the defendant for violating the ordinance when they observed him for 30 minutes, and “the location and defendant’s conduct were consistent with crack dealing.”
Christopher London Walker, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that in ineffective -assistance-of-counsel claims, the “distorting effects of hindsight must be filtered out” (quotation omitted)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Mark Christian Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Mark Christian Anderson Minn. Ct. App. 2015
the supreme court concluded that probable cause was present where officers saw the appellant make at least six brief transactions over a period of thirty minutes.
State of Minnesota v. Lori Ann Fulwiler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Lori Ann Fulwiler Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Ahavel Abimbola Scherz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Ahavel Abimbola Scherz Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(rejecting per se rule that representation by a suspended attorney violates the right to counsel and holding that, while the attorney’s “misconduct was serious, meriting disbarment, it was unrelated to [his] representation of defendant and was not so egregious as to infect the trial and undermine
State v. Graham 764 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2009
State v. Graham 764 N.W.2d 340 Minn. 2009
-14 (Minn.1991) (upholding representation by an unlicensed criminal defense attorney); (declining to dismiss a complaint signed by an unlicensed attorney).
State v. Ali 752 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Ali 752 N.W.2d 98 Minn. Ct. App. 2008