Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Hoaglund, 240 N.W.2d 4.

65 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Paul James Steichen Minn. 2026
The district court must then determine whether the “defendant’s admissions of the relevant facts and circumstances of his conduct establish that he committed the offense charged or an offense at least as serious as the offense to which he is tendering his plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Sylvester Jones 7 N.W.3d 391 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Sylvester Jones 7 N.W.3d 391 Minn. 2024
Id.; 7 d 743, 744–45, 747 (Minn. 1994); Ecker, d at 717; d 852, 860 (Minn. 2016).
Justin Marcus Rosendahl, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
“It is to be hoped that the [district court] judge, in [a ccepting a plea], will ask the questions with respect to the factual basis fo r the crime so as to avoid th e rather common inclination of counsel to elicit these fact s by leading questions.” State v. Hoaglund
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
6 Cuffy argues that his pleas are inaccurate because , although they included admissions regarding each and every essential element of the offense, they lacked “sufficient detail” to permit the district court to determine guilt.1 Cuffy relies on two cases for this argument: State v. Hoaglund , and Shorter v. State
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“It is to be hoped that the trial judge, in [accepti ng a plea], will ask the questions with respect to the factual basis for the crime so as to avoid the rather common inclination of counsel to elicit these facts by leading questions.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Shorter v. State , 746 (Minn. 1994) (reversing postconviction court and remanding where factual basis was established solely on leading questions and the police department found exculpatory evidence after the plea, admitting that the original investigation was incomplete ); State v. Hoaglund , -5 (Minn. 1976) (concluding that district court and attorneys failed to ask any questions regarding a necessary element of the offense).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
n.9 (Minn. 1976) (permitting use of whole record, including the PSI, to determine if there was an adequate factual basis for the guilty plea); (noting that the PSI established an adequate factual basis for the guilty plea).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Sanchez v. State , aff’d, see also State v. Hoaglund , n.9 (1976) (permitting use of whole record, including presentence investigation report ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See State v. Hoaglund , n.9 (1976) (permitting use of whole record, including the PSI); (noting PSI, which contained defendant’s version of crime, constituted an adequate factual basis for guilty plea).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(citing State v. Trott , (permitting use of the whole record, including the complaint and photographs); State v. Hoaglund , n.9 (Minn. 1976) (permitting use of the whole record, including presentence investigation report); (permitting use of presentence investigation report that included defendant’s detailed version of the crime)).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
supplemen ted by other evidence to establish the factual basis for a plea.” (concluding that the record as a whole, which included the complaint and photos of the victim’s injuries taken at the hospital, was sufficient to establish factual basi s for guilty plea); (looking to the record as a whole, including the presentence investigation, in evaluating factual basis for guilty plea); (noting that the presentence inves tigation contained 8 defendant’s version of crime in detail and, while its use
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“The court should be particularly wary of situations in which the factual basis is established by asking a defendant only leading questions.” Raleigh, d at 94; State v. Hoagl und, 307 Minn. 322, 326
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Trott, d at 252 (concluding that an adequate factual basis for a plea existed because by pleading guilty the defendant “judicially admitted the allegations contained in the complaint”); State v. Hoaglund , 307 Minn. 322, 326- 27, (considering the complaint in concluding that a plea lacked an adequate factual basis).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-sentence investigation report, “to establish the factual basis for the plea.” (relying on a grand- jury transcript in district court record to establish factual basis for guilty plea); Trott, 338 d at 252 (relying on complaint and photo exhibits in district court record to establish factual basis for guilty plea); State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 327 n.9, n.9 (1976) (assessing adequacy of guilty plea).
State of Minnesota v. Cody John Opheim Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Cody John Opheim Minn. Ct. App. 2016
See, (concluding that an adequate factual basis for a plea existed in part because by pleading guilty, the defendant “in effect judicially admitted the allegations contained in the complaint”); State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 326-27, (considering the contents of the criminal complaint, among other documents in the record, before concluding that a plea lacked an adequate factual basis).
Darek Jon Nelson v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2016
Darek Jon Nelson v. State of Minnesota 880 N.W.2d 852 Minn. 2016
Raleigh, d at 94-95; -45, 747 (Minn. 1994); State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 326
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
he plea hearing, 686 (Minn. 1979); evidence introduced during partial trial, – 33 (Minn. 1978), and a detective’s sworn complaint, a presentence-investigation report (PSI), and the defendant’s Department of Corrections file, State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 326–27 & n.9, & n.9 (1976).
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Kissner Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Patrick James Kissner Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 325
Lussier v. State 821 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2012
Lussier v. State 821 N.W.2d 581 Minn. 2012
(concluding that the record as a whole, which included the complaint and photos of the victim’s injuries taken at the hospital, was sufficient to establish factual basis for guilty plea); State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , 327 n. 9, , 6 n. 9 (1976) (holding that the record as a whole, which included PSI, was insufficient to establish factual basis for guilty plea); Burnett v. State, 292 Minn. 485, 486 , (noting that the presentence investigation contained defendant’s version of crime in detail a
State v. Eller 780 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
State v. Eller 780 N.W.2d 375 Minn. Ct. App. 2010
See, (concluding that adequate factual basis for a plea existed in part because, in pleading guilty, the defendant admitted to the facts alleged in the criminal complaint); State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , (considering the contents of the criminal complaint, among other documents in the record, before concluding that a plea lacked adequate factual basis).
State v. Raleigh 778 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2010
State v. Raleigh 778 N.W.2d 90 Minn. 2010
In State v. Hoaglund, we stated: “It is to be hoped that the trial judge, in [accepting a plea], will ask the questions with respect to the factual basis for the crime so as to avoid the rather common inclination of counsel to elicit these facts by leading questions.” 307 Minn. 322, 326
State v. Iverson 664 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2003
State v. Iverson 664 N.W.2d 346 Minn. 2003
See Ecker, d at 716-17 , and State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , -6 (1976).
Vernlund v. State 589 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
Vernlund v. State 589 N.W.2d 307 Minn. Ct. App. 1999
State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 325 , (trial court has primary responsibility to question defendant to ensure factual basis for plea).
State v. Ecker 524 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1994
State v. Ecker 524 N.W.2d 712 Minn. 1994
(citing State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , ).
Shorter v. State 511 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1994
Shorter v. State 511 N.W.2d 743 Minn. 1994
State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322
State v. Warren 419 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
State v. Warren 419 N.W.2d 795 Minn. 1988
The purpose of the factual basis requirement of Rule 15.02 is to ensure the guilty plea is “accurate, voluntary and intelligent (i.e., knowingly and understand *798 ably made).” see State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , Beaman v. State, 301 Minn. 180
State v. Lyle 409 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
State v. Lyle 409 N.W.2d 549 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
261 (Minn.1983); State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 825
State v. Kloskowski 378 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Kloskowski 378 N.W.2d 805 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 325-26 , -6 (1976).
State v. Grunewald 378 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
State v. Grunewald 378 N.W.2d 55 Minn. Ct. App. 1985
See also, State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 325
State v. Trott 338 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1983
State v. Trott 338 N.W.2d 248 Minn. 1983
State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322, 240 .
State v. Brown 324 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1982
State v. Brown 324 N.W.2d 380 Minn. 1982
State v. Hoaglund, 307 Minn. 322 , State v. Russell, 306 Minn. 274
State v. Melina 295 N.W.2d 644 Minn. 1980