Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Kochevar v. State, 281 N.W.2d 680.

116 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Michael Lamontice Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Michael Lamontice Smith Minn. Ct. App. 2025
the supreme court stated, “It is well settled that an unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.” Id.
State of Minnesota v. Sylvester Jones 7 N.W.3d 391 Minn. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Sylvester Jones 7 N.W.3d 391 Minn. 2024
6 Although it is preferable that the factual basis be established from the defendant’s own testimony after a plea of guilty, this approach is “not the exclusive method.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
“It is well settled that an unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.” d 680, 687 (Minn. 1979).
State of Minnesota v. Devin Lee Arola Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
State of Minnesota v. Devin Lee Arola Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“It is well settled that an unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Deshon Israel Bonnell, Minn. 2022
7 is committing a predicate felony if the predicate felony and the killing are part of “one continuous transaction.” Kochevar v. State , (upholding a conviction for felony murder based on a predicate offense of aggravated assault when the defendant admitted he fired one shot to scare the victim and “ [w]ithin seconds” a struggle ensued, and the fatal shot was fired ).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
21, 1987); see also Kochevar v. State , (“It is well settled that an un qualified promise which is a part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilt y plea may be withdraw n.”).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Kochevar v. State , 687 (Minn. 1979).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“It is well settled that an unqualified prom ise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.” d 680, 687 (Minn. 1979).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Ellis-Strong 899 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Ellis-Strong 899 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
and an unpublished opinion from this court, State v. Levkovich, No. C4-03-232, 2003 WL 21694582 , at *3-4 (Minn. App. July 22, 2003), review denied (Minn. Sept.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests in any significant degree on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise.” (quotation omitted); (“[A]n unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.”).
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
Brown v. State 895 N.W.2d 612 Minn. 2017
“It is well settled that an unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.” (citing Olness v. State, 290 Minn. 198 , Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 , 92 S.Ct.
A16-0648 Minn. 2017
“It is well settled that an unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.” ( Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257 (1971)); (“A plea agreement is in many ways analogous to a contract whose terms will not be enforced to benefit a 9 breaching party.” (citations omit
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Chaz Jacobi Beckman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Chaz Jacobi Beckman Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A guilty plea is involuntary when it rests in any significant degree on an unfulfilled or unfulfillable promise.” (quotation omitted); (“[A]n unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn.”).
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Nicholas Taylor Rod Minn. Ct. App. 2016
tained in the complaint” and “pictures 4 of the victim’s injuries,” “sworn statements and testimony of the victims introduced at earlier hearings,” “[t]he state’s evidence, as summarized by the prosecutor” at the plea hearing, 686 (Minn. 1979); evidence introduced during partial trial, – 33 (Minn. 1978), and a detective’s sworn complaint, a presentence-investigation report (PSI), and the defendant’s Department of Correct
State of Minnesota v. Kyle Mitchell Hood Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Kyle Mitchell Hood Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Fox 868 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas James Fox 868 N.W.2d 206 Minn. 2015
Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robel Belay Kubrom v. State of Minnesota 863 N.W.2d 88 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
at 882; (stating that “[i]t is well settled that an unqualified promise which is part of a plea arrangement must be honored or else the guilty plea may be withdrawn”).
State of Minnesota v. Jermale Jermar Kling Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Moses Gum Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Moses Gum Benjamin Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Jermale Jermar Kling Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Uselman v. State 831 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Uselman v. State 831 N.W.2d 690 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
Carey v. State 765 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
Carey v. State 765 N.W.2d 396 Minn. Ct. App. 2009
State v. Meredyk 754 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Meredyk 754 N.W.2d 596 Minn. Ct. App. 2008
State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Prax 686 N.W.2d 45 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
State v. Rhodes 675 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 2004
State v. Rhodes 675 N.W.2d 323 Minn. 2004
State v. Darris 648 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 2002
State v. Darris 648 N.W.2d 232 Minn. 2002
A conviction for felony murder will be upheld only when the killing and the felony are part of “one continuous transaction.”
State v. Brown 606 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 2000
State v. Brown 606 N.W.2d 670 Minn. 2000