Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Hubbard Broadcasting, Inc. v. City of Afton, 323 N.W.2d 757.

65 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Application of Andrew Wheeler for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Hubbard Broad., n.4 (Minn. 1982) (“Not all of the reasons stated need be legally sufficient and supported by facts in the record.”).
In the Matter of the Application of DOB Properties, LLC, for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2026
See Hubbard Broadcasting, n.4 (Minn. 1982).
Cass County, Respondent, vs. Rhonda Aho, Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Cass County, Respondent, vs. Rhonda Aho, Appellant Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(quoting Hubbard Broadcasting, ).
In the Matter of the Application of Jim Goodpaster and Sherry Timmermann Goodpaster for a Conditional Use Permit. Minn. Ct. App. 2023
ut of respect for the separation of powers, our review is limited and deferential, see Big Lake, d at 491, and a relator bears the burden of persuading a reviewing court that the reasons for denial of a CUP were “legally insufficient or had no factual basis in the record.” (citing Hubbard Broad., ) .
In the Matter of the Application of Impact Power Solutions, LLC and MN CSG 2019-29 LLC for a … Minn. Ct. App. 2022
A municipal council’s denial of a CUP is le gally sufficient if it is base d on reasons “relating to public health, safety[,] and general welfare or becau se of incompatibility between the proposed use and a municipality’s comprehensive municipal plan.” Hubbard Broad., Inc. v. City of 4 Afton
Woodland Gale Owners’ Association, LLC, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Hubbard Broad., n.4 (Minn. 1982).
Minnesota Sands, LLC, Minn. 2020
See Hubbard D-15 Broad., 766 (Minn. 1982) (analyzing the merits of a takings claim even though the claimant’s property interest was “conditioned upon the granting .
Minnesota Solar, LLC, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
But it is well settled that “[n]ot all of the reasons” for the denial of a CUP “need be legally sufficient and supported by facts in the record.” Hubbard Broad., n.4 (Minn. 1982).
A Resolution Setting Forth Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law and Order Denying S. M. Hentges & … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Hubbard Broad., Inc. v. City of Afto n
Sno-Barons Snowmobile Club, Inc., Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
RDNT, LLC v. City of Bloomington 861 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 2015
RDNT, LLC v. City of Bloomington 861 N.W.2d 71 Minn. 2015
See Hubbard Broad., , 765 n. 4 (Minn.1982) ("Not all of the reasons stated need be legally sufficient and supported by facts in the record.”).
Volunteers of America-Minnesota v. City of Saint Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Volunteers of America-Minnesota v. City of Saint Paul Minn. Ct. App. 2015
David Vigstol, Relators v. Isanti County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2014
David Vigstol, Relators v. Isanti County Board of Commissioners Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan 734 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2007
Wensmann Realty, Inc. v. City of Eagan 734 N.W.2d 623 Minn. 2007
See, e.g., Hubbard Broad., Krahl, d at 543 ; Czech, 312 Minn. at 539 , d at 274 .
Concept Properties, LLP v. City of Minnetrista 694 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
Concept Properties, LLP v. City of Minnetrista 694 N.W.2d 804 Minn. Ct. App. 2005
CEMETERY v. City of Roseville 689 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
CEMETERY v. City of Roseville 689 N.W.2d 254 Minn. Ct. App. 2004
Yang v. County of Carver 660 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
Yang v. County of Carver 660 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
PTL, LLC v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 656 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
PTL, LLC v. Chisago County Board of Commissioners 656 N.W.2d 567 Minn. Ct. App. 2003
7 (2002) (defining conditional use as use that may be allowed on finding that it conforms to county’s comprehensive plan); Hubbard Broad., (holding that city council’s determination that proposed use was inconsistent with comprehensive plan justified denial of special-use permit); SuperAmerica Group, d at 267 (holding that incompatibility between proposed use and “definite and objective standards” in city’s comprehensive plan *5
Beca of Alexandria, L.L.P. v. County of Douglas Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners 607 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Beca of Alexandria, L.L.P. v. County of Douglas Ex Rel. Board of Commissioners 607 N.W.2d 459 Minn. Ct. App. 2000
Hubbard Broadcasting, (where land use plan emphasizes rural character and scenic beauty, council’s denial of permit for satellite station because of incompatibility with comprehensive plan was legally sufficient); C.R.
Trisko v. City of Waite Park 566 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
Trisko v. City of Waite Park 566 N.W.2d 349 Minn. Ct. App. 1997
“Not all reasons” for the denial of a conditional use permit “need be legally sufficient and supported by facts in the record.” Hubbard Broad., , 765 n. 4 (Minn.1982).
SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada 539 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
SuperAmerica Group, Inc. v. City of Little Canada 539 N.W.2d 264 Minn. Ct. App. 1995
Hubbard Broadcasting, C.R.
Sovereign v. Dunn 498 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
Sovereign v. Dunn 498 N.W.2d 62 Minn. Ct. App. 1993
BBY INVESTORS v. City of Maplewood 467 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
BBY INVESTORS v. City of Maplewood 467 N.W.2d 631 Minn. Ct. App. 1991
See Hubbard Broadcasting, *635
Thompson v. City of Red Wing 455 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Thompson v. City of Red Wing 455 N.W.2d 512 Minn. Ct. App. 1990
Hubbard Broadcasting, (citation omitted).
The Minnesota Daily v. University of Minnesota 432 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
The Minnesota Daily v. University of Minnesota 432 N.W.2d 189 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Parranto Bros., Inc. v. City of New Brighton 425 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Parranto Bros., Inc. v. City of New Brighton 425 N.W.2d 585 Minn. Ct. App. 1988
Swanson v. City of Bloomington 421 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1988
Swanson v. City of Bloomington 421 N.W.2d 307 Minn. 1988
and Hubbard Broadcasting, to harmonize our cases, and to modify, if necessary, the procedure for review of zoning decisions set out in Honn .
County of Wright v. Kennedy 415 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
County of Wright v. Kennedy 415 N.W.2d 728 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hubbard Broadcasting, (regulation by zoning does not constitute compen-sable taking unless it deprives property of all reasonable uses)
In Re the Variance Request of Johnson 404 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
In Re the Variance Request of Johnson 404 N.W.2d 298 Minn. Ct. App. 1987
Hubbard Broadcasting, , 765 n. 4 (Minn.1982).
Swanson v. City of Bloomington 395 N.W.2d 719 Minn. Ct. App. 1987