Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc., 721 N.W.2d 340.

479 citing documents.

Kristi Jolly, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“ Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Christine Jacobson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Oliver McCrary, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Credibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be distu rbed on appeal.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
James Treptau, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether the 5 employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Helen Brown, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Ardell Tesmer, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc. , 4 (Minn. App. 2006).
Jason Gannon, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Hamida Jama, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision and will not disturb the findings “when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Jennifer Hursey, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Wilson, d at 462–63 (noting that employers have right to reasonably expect applicants to tell truth during employment process and concluding that employee’s employment-application misstatement constituted misconduct); Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc. , (concluding that cashier who stole food engaged in misconduct when employer no longer 6 trusted her to handle money and accurately account for items sold).
Cynthia M. Leisey, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Amy Stevens, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., see also Minn. Stat. § 268.105 subd.
Cari Van Hecke, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Donna E. Schwartz, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
James Barnett, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Shari Flanagan, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Elmore Truck and Trailer Repair, Inc., Relator (A16-1008), Dahl Trucking, Inc., Relator (A16-1009), Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Terrance Simon, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A reviewing court accords deference to a ULJ’s decision not to hold an additional hearing and will reverse that decision only for an abuse of discretion.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Noelle L. Norris, Relator v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Noelle L. Norris, Relator v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Jennifer L. Stubbs, Relator v. Sprint/United Management Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jennifer L. Stubbs, Relator v. Sprint/United Management Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Chrystal Gardner, Relator v. Community Action Duluth, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Relator, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dev., Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Chrystal Gardner, Relator v. Community Action Duluth, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (stating that the ULJ’s factual findings are viewed in the light most favorable to the decision which includes giving deference to the ULJ’s credibility determinations).
Nina Wilson v. Mortgage Resource Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 888 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2016
Nina Wilson v. Mortgage Resource Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 888 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2016
The dissent also looks to Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., to distinguish this case from cases in which the court of appeals has found a single incident to constitute misconduct.
Brent R. Henkel, Relator v. City of Mountain Iron, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ryan J. Wilson, Relator v. Harris Davis Rebar, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Loria Quade, Relator v. City of Minneapolis, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sharon Hobbs, Relator v. The Polishing Touch, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sharon Hobbs, Relator v. The Polishing Touch, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Ryan J. Wilson, Relator v. Harris Davis Rebar, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
3 “A reviewing court accords deference to a ULJ’s decision not to hold an additional hearing and will reverse that decision only for an abuse of discretion.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citation omitted).
Loria Quade, Relator v. City of Minneapolis, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Brent R. Henkel, Relator v. City of Mountain Iron, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Yitagesu Wolde, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Yitagesu Wolde, Relator v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Nikol Dowls, Relator v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nikol Dowls, Relator v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision, giving deference to the credibility determinations made by the ULJ.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citations omitted).
A-1 Construction, Inc., Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A-1 Construction, Inc., Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Patti L. Davies, Relator v. Donaldson Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Patti L. Davies, Relator v. Donaldson Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision and will not disturb the findings “when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Ayode A. Ogunkola, Relator v. Cirrus Design Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ayode A. Ogunkola, Relator v. Cirrus Design Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Velma Ostman, Relator v. Range Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Velma Ostman, Relator v. Range Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Randy Paulzine, Relator v. Charter Communications, LLC, Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Randy Paulzine, Relator v. Charter Communications, LLC, Minnesota Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Deborah Hagen, Relator v. Family Focused Recovery Services, PLLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016