DocketDrift

Real-time tracking of state judicial trends.

Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc., 721 N.W.2d 340.

483 citing documents.

Nse Umana v. FedEx Ground Package System, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Sean Roulo v. Key Lakes, Inc., et al., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Charlotte Smith v. Health Partners, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc. , (stating that this court gives “deference to the credibility determinations made by the ULJ”).
Richard Christensen v. Benedictine Living Community of Mora, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We view the ULJ’s factual findings in th e light most favorable to the decision, giving deference to the credibility determinations made by the ULJ.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citations omitted).
Kristi Jolly v. Handyhelp LLC - Healing Home, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“ Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Christine Jacobson v. Department of Employment & Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Oliver McCrary v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Credibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be distu rbed on appeal.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
James Treptau v. Federal Cartridge Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether the 5 employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Helen Brown v. PDR Administrative Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Ardell Tesmer v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc. , 4 (Minn. App. 2006).
Jason Gannon v. United Parcel Service, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Hamida Jama v. Wise Home Health Care, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision and will not disturb the findings “when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Jennifer Hursey v. Homeservices Lending, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Wilson, d at 462–63 (noting that employers have right to reasonably expect applicants to tell truth during employment process and concluding that employee’s employment-application misstatement constituted misconduct); Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc. , (concluding that cashier who stole food engaged in misconduct when employer no longer 6 trusted her to handle money and accurately account for items sold).
Cynthia M. Leisey v. Express Scripts Services Company, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Amy Stevens v. Smart Parts Automotive, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., see also Minn. Stat. § 268.105 subd.
Cari Van Hecke v. Annandale Advocate, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Donna E. Schwartz v. Customer Elation, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
James Barnett v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Elmore Truck and Trailer Repair, Inc. (A16-1008), Dahl Trucking, Inc. (A16-1009) v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Terrance Simon v. Launch Technical Workforce Solutions, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A reviewing court accords deference to a ULJ’s decision not to hold an additional hearing and will reverse that decision only for an abuse of discretion.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Shari Flanagan v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Noelle L. Norris v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Noelle L. Norris v. Mayo Foundation for Medical Education & Research, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Jennifer L. Stubbs v. Sprint/United Management Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Jennifer L. Stubbs v. Sprint/United Management Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Chrystal Gardner v. Community Action Duluth, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Vincent Rosetta v. Quality Bicycle Products, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Dev., Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Chrystal Gardner v. Community Action Duluth, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (stating that the ULJ’s factual findings are viewed in the light most favorable to the decision which includes giving deference to the ULJ’s credibility determinations).
Nina Wilson v. Mortgage Resource Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 888 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2016
Nina Wilson v. Mortgage Resource Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development 888 N.W.2d 452 Minn. 2016
The dissent also looks to Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., to distinguish this case from cases in which the court of appeals has found a single incident to constitute misconduct.
Brent R. Henkel v. City of Mountain Iron, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ryan J. Wilson v. Harris Davis Rebar, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Loria Quade v. City of Minneapolis, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sharon Hobbs v. The Polishing Touch, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sharon Hobbs v. The Polishing Touch, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Ryan J. Wilson v. Harris Davis Rebar, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
3 “A reviewing court accords deference to a ULJ’s decision not to hold an additional hearing and will reverse that decision only for an abuse of discretion.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citation omitted).
Loria Quade v. City of Minneapolis, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Brent R. Henkel v. City of Mountain Iron, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Yitagesu Wolde v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Yitagesu Wolde v. Minnesota Department of Veterans Affairs, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Nikol Dowls v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Nikol Dowls v. Select Comfort Retail Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision, giving deference to the credibility determinations made by the ULJ.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (citations omitted).
A-1 Construction, Inc. v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A-1 Construction, Inc. v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Patti L. Davies v. Donaldson Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Patti L. Davies v. Donaldson Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
We view the ULJ’s factual findings in the light most favorable to the decision and will not disturb the findings “when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Ayode A. Ogunkola v. Cirrus Design Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Ayode A. Ogunkola v. Cirrus Design Corporation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Velma Ostman v. Range Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016