Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Skarhus v. Davanni's Inc., 721 N.W.2d 340.

483 citing documents.

Song Sibell v. U. S. Postal Service, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Randall Rahn v. Midway Farm Equipment, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We view the ULJ’s findings of fact in the light most favorable to its decision , and “will not disturb the ULJ’s factual findings when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., .
Charlene Hughes v. Vivien Bacaner, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
We view the ULJ’s findings of fact in the light most favorable to its decision , and “will not disturb the ULJ’ s factual findings when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Theodore Swantz v. Premier Transportation, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Credibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Daniel Larson v. Heymann Construction Company, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Credibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc. , .
Jennifer S. Bild v. Agape Healthcare Services Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
See Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc. , (concluding that credibility determinations are the “exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal”); Minn. Stat. § 268.105, subd.
Connie J. Meier v. Steven E. Pierce, CPA, Ltd., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Bruce F. Filson DDS PA v. Kelly Yocom, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Emily C. Dzurak v. Discover Strength Personal Fitness Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
We view the ULJ’s findings of fact in the light most favorable to its decision, and “will not disturb the ULJ’s factual findings when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Dan Casey v. Minnesota Department of Corrections, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., d 340, 344 (Minn. App. 2006).
In the Matter of: Tracy Toulouse Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Daniel A. Vogel v. Order of St. Benedict, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
James R. Waclawik v. Viking Coca-Cola Bottling Company, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Credibility determinations are the excl usive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Abdirahman Warsame v. Arlyce Cleveland, Ltd., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
David Luckow v. City of Saint Paul, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Skarhus v. Davanni’ s Inc.
Pierre A. Goudiaby v. Sky Water Technology Foundry, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., .
Wahnita Felien v. VFW Richfield Fred Babcock Post 5555, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1a(a) (2018) (“When the credibility of a witness testifying in a hearing has a significant effect on the outcome of a decision, the unemployment law judge must set out the reason for crediting or discrediting that testimony.”); Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (“Credibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal.”).
Erwin Butler v. Mahkahta Trucking, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (“Credibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal.”).
Tami Kraker v. CentraCare Health System Melrose, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
On review of a ULJ’s findings of fact, “we will not disturb the ULJ’s fac tual findings when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Rebecca Greenstein v. Allina Health System, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Kristin K. Choronzy v. Viracon, Inc. (1995) (Joint Account), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Donald Thaemert v. Electrolux Home Appliances, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether an employee committed misconduct is a mixed question of fact and law.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Pamela Powell v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“[W]hether the act committed by the empl oyee constitutes employment misconduct is a question of law, which we review de novo.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Richard Thurmer v. Diff’s Trucking, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
But on review of an ULJ’s findings of fact, “we will not disturb the ULJ’s factual findings when the evidence substantially sustains them.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Sokkhan Ka v. Lonvigson’s Service Center, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“Whether an employee committed misconduct is a mixed question of fact and law.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Katerina Steiger v. Cub Foods, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Whether an employee “committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni ’s Inc.
Robyn Potter v. St. Joseph's Medical Center, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Walter Nachtigall v. Marriott International, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Robert Welch v. Twin Express, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Grp., d 7 328, 332 (Minn. App. 2009) (quoting Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., ).
Brittany Selander v. Osseo School District, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Michael Schemel v. Vermilion Capital Management, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A reviewing court accords deference to a ULJ’s decision not to hold an additional hearing and wi ll reverse that decision only for an abuse of discretion.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Sharon Olsen v. Lindberg Chiropractic, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Dawn Johnson v. Dakota County Receiving Center, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
be on vibrate or loud enough to hear” and that , at the time of her discharge, she was reminded “ that it was a medical necessity for her to be available by phone, and sh e was not available.” The ULJ made an express determination that Johnson was “not credible .” “Credibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s
Eric Petersen v. Custom Search, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The credibility of witnesses is the “exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s, Inc.
Joanne Lane v. D W Jones Management, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Wendy Davis v. International Brotherhood of Electrical Workers #292 Health Care Plan, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Patty Kirkey v. LSS of Traverse, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Isaac Erickson v. OTG Management, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc., (“Credibility determinations are the exclusive province of the ULJ and will not be disturbed on appeal.”).
Latonia Rolbiecki v. Regions Hospital, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Ryan Wille v. Pan-O-Gold Baking Co (Corp), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Clayton Teslow v. Mag Mechanical, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4(1) (2016); Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc. , 3 (Minn. App. 2006).
Glenda Brush v. Holiday Stationstores, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Whether an employee “committed a particular act is a question of 5 fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Mark Johnson v. OSD Transport Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Whether [an] employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Richard Inyang v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Granville Butler v. Primeflight Aviation Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Hussein Elseweissy v. Gasthof Zur Gemutlichkeit, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Heidi Kardell v. Institute of Facial Surgery St. Paul, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Scott Souter v. Fastenal Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Dava nni’s Inc., d 340, 344 (Minn. App. 2006).
Robert T. O’Neill v. Ebenezer Realty Services Company, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.
Patti A. Peroni v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
5 “Whether the employee committed a particular act is a question of fact.” Skarhus v. Davanni’s Inc.