Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Theis, 742 N.W.2d 643.

441 citing documents.

Felix Kasper Piah v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Although the fair -and-just standard “is less demanding than the manifest injustice standard, it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” State v. Theis , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Shantha Jayapathy Minn. Ct. App. 2020
However, “a court must allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea, even after sentencing, if ‘withdra wal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.’” (quoting Minn. R. 3 Crim.
Lonnie Har Larson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
(holding a plea invalid when it was not accurate).
State of Minnesota v. Bradly James Haddock Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Bradley D. Fordyce v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2020
State of Minnesota v. Richard Danell Dunston Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Instead, he argues that “it would have at least been fair and just to allow him to withdraw his plea.” Although the fair -and-just standard is “less demanding than the manifest injustice standard, it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Brown Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re the Marriage of: Heidi Ann Kingsley v. Isaiah Thomas Kingsley Minn. Ct. App. 2019
(stating that “the court must be able to determin e that the defendant, despite maintaining his innocence, agrees that evidence the [s]tate is likely to offer at trial is sufficient to convict” ).
Malik Jordan Olsen v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Erick Lamont Lindsey v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Jacob John Friedrichs Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Markhel D. Franklin v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Lawrence Raymond Burns Minn. Ct. App. 2019
However, “a court must allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea, even after sentencing, if ‘withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.’” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
Gene Rechtzigel v. State of Minnesota, AND State of Minnesota, vs. Gene Rechtzigel Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Theis , see also North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25, 38, 91 S. Ct. 160, 168 (1970) (holding that in s ome circumstances, a court may cons titutionally accept a defendant’ s guilty plea even though the defendant maintained his innocence).
Deon Lashawn Mallett v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Aleshia Lynn Becklund Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Kelsey Anna Ballman v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Mary Kate Nguyen v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Shawn Douglas Ratcliff Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Pierre Lemar Burgess Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Theresa Angela DiMaggio Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Omar Kwabena Walford Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Bounlieng Moon Chaokhio Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Lewonda Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1; (examining manifest injustice as a threshold matter although the appellant only raised the fair-and-just standard on appeal).
Jeremy John Queen v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Devontre Jordan Vann Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Theis , (citing North Carolina v. Alford, 400 U.S. 25, 38, 91 S. Ct. 160, 167–68 (1970)).
State of Minnesota v. Glenn David Johnson Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See State v. Theis , d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007).
In re Welfare of K. L. W. 924 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
In re Welfare of K. L. W. 924 N.W.2d 649 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State v. Theis , , 647 (Minn. 2007) (citing North Carolina v. Alford , 400 U.S. 25 , 38, 91 S.Ct.
State of Minnesota v. Spencer Perkins Minn. Ct. App. 2019
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2019
d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007).
Nicholas Johnson and Michelle Johnson, individually and as parents and natural guardians of D.J., a minor v. West … Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Wilondae Daron Easter Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. David Joseph Madrigal Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Theis , d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Melie Ike Ilogu Minn. Ct. App. 2018
The fair -and-just “standard is less demanding than the manifest injustice standard,” but “it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” State v. Theis , (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Larry Donnell Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Jennifer Natalie Bernard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Mathew Erickson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Although the fair-and-just standard “is less demanding” than the manifest-injustice standard, “it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Michael Travis Porter Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lee Ranzy Minn. Ct. App. 2018
While the fair- and-just standard “is less demanding than the manifest injustice standard, it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007) (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Grant David Hendrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Bernard Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Thomas Ogris Minn. Ct. App. 2018
d 643, 646 (Minn. 2007).
State of Minnesota v. Blake Andrew Dearmond Minn. Ct. App. 2018
David Walt Studanski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Gideon Charles Arrington, II v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Because of the inherent conflict between pleading guilty and maintaining innocence, caselaw requires a “strong factual basis for an Alford plea.”
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Russell Patchen Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Although the fair-and-just standard “is less 5 demanding” than the manifest-injustice sta ndard, “it does not allow a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea for simply any reason.” (quotation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Scott Bradley Knutson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
An Alford plea is accurate if (1) it is established by a proper factual basis, which exists if the plea is based on “evidence discussed with t he defendant on the record at the plea hearing” and (2) the defendant “agrees that evidence the State is likely to offer at trial is sufficient to convict.”
State of Minnesota v. Jerrmaine Winston Knowles Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Damon Michael DiMartino Minn. Ct. App. 2017