Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Lindsey, 755 N.W.2d 752.

116 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
55 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
6 (Spreigl2 evidence); (relationship evidence), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Such evidence may aid the jury in considering “the credibility of the principals in the relationship.” McCoy, d at 161; (noting that relationship evidence has “significant probative value in assisting the jury to judge witness credibility”), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State v. Andersen 900 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Andersen 900 N.W.2d 438 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lindsey, 57 (Minn. App. 2008) (stating that cautionary instructions lessened the probability that the jury would give undue weight to the relationship evidence), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The district court’s cautionary instructions “lessened the probability of undue weight being given by the jury to the evidence.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Evidence that helps to establish the relationship between the victim and the defendant or which places th e event in context bolsters its probative value.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Paul Hilton Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Christopher Paul Hilton Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Greene Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Joseph Greene Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. 6 Lindsey, review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Taeng Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. Taeng Yang Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Matthews, d at 549 (stating that relationship evidence may be probative by helping jury assess witness credibility); -57 (Minn. App. 2008) (same), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Louis Duane Bennett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Louis Duane Bennett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Frederick Raymond Couch Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Frederick Raymond Couch Minn. Ct. App. 2016
ormed the jury that the evidence was being submitted for the limited purpose of assisting the jury to determine whether Couch committed the charged offense, it was to be used to demonstrate the nature and extent of his relationship with H.M., the jury was not to convict Couch of any other offense, and it was not to convict him on the basis of any occurrence against H.M.4 (stating that cautionary instructions lessened the probability that the jury would give undue weight to relationship evidence)
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Chermack Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. James Michael Chermack Minn. Ct. App. 2016
that the evidence was being submitted for the limited purpose of assisting in determining whether Chermack committed the charged offense, it was not to be used to prove his character or that he acted in conformity with that character, the jury was not to convict Chermack of any other offense, and it was not to convict him on the basis of any occurrence against F.E.J.B.7 (stating that cautionary instructions lessened the probability that the jury would give undue weight to relationship evidence),
State of Minnesota v. Abel Gonyamonquah Miamen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Abel Gonyamonquah Miamen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 752, 755 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Eric Michael Bohumil Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Eric Michael Bohumil Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Tristan Leroy Trice Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Tristan Leroy Trice Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Marquette Rowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Derrick Marquette Rowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Such evidence is “particularly important [when, as 4 here, the defendant] exercised his right not to testify and [the victim’s] testimony contradicted her earlier statements to investigators.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Yunmie Quiwonkpa Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Yunmie Quiwonkpa Minn. Ct. App. 2015
A district court’s cautionary instruction “lessen[s] the probability of undue weight being given by the jury to the evidence.” (quotation omitted), review denied (Minn. Oct.
Joshua Steven Parsons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Joshua Steven Parsons v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. George Cornelius Watkins Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. George Cornelius Watkins Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Alan Edsill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Dustin Alan Edsill Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Gerald Michalec Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Gerald Michalec Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“Evidence that helps to establish the relationship between the victim and the defendant or which places the event in context bolsters its probative value.” review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Jeremiah Thomas Lord Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Jeremiah Thomas Lord Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Erick Robert Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Erick Robert Gordon Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Larry Maurice Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Larry Maurice Taylor Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Stacy Dean Darrell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Stacy Dean Darrell Minn. Ct. App. 2015
(), review denied (Minn. Oct.
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Cap McCowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Rodney Cap McCowan Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Oct.

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by