Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Marriage of Grachek v. Grachek, 750 N.W.2d 328.

27 citing documents.

In re the Marriage of: Minn. Ct. App. 2024
See Grachek v. Grachek , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
Ramsey County Child Support, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
In re the Marriage of: Deborah Ann Barnett, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Once spousal maintenance has been awarded, “[p] arties to a dissolution action have a general statutory right to seek modification of a maintenance award .” Grachek v. Grachek , rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Amanda Leigh Davis Floyd, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
5 (setting forth the requirements to waive the right to modification of maintenance) (2022); -04 (Minn. 1989) (holding such waivers to be valid); (noting that “[s]uch a waiver agreement is frequently referred to as a Karon waiver”), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Maureen A. Chevalier, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Grachek v. Grachek , -31 (Minn. App. 2008), rev. denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Kevin James Stanton, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Benjamin Walter Eidem, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Matthew Durand Dornquast, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
5 When a stipulated judgment and decree is ambiguous, its interpretation is a question of law subject to de novo review; “we do not defer to the district court’s interpretation of a stipulated provision in a dissolution decree.” Ertl v. Ertl , (“[T]he interpretation of .
In re the Marriage of: Michele Lura Honderich-Flannery, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Grachek v. Grachek , review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Dawn R. Imme, n/k/a Dawn RaNee Edwardson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Marriage of Anderson v. Anderson 897 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Marriage of Anderson v. Anderson 897 N.W.2d 828 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Cost-of-Living Award A. Generally “A district court has broad discretion over issues of spousal maintenance, and generally we will not reverse a decision regarding maintenance absent an abuse of this discretion.” -31 (Minn. App. 2008) (establishing that this standard applies in appeals that involve a COLA), review denied (Minn. Aug.
Christine Diane Eyal, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
However, we previously determined that “issues of subject-matter jurisdiction and the interpretation of statutes and stipulations in dissolution judgments are questions of law, which we review de novo.” (M inn.
In re the Marriage of: Elizabeth Mary Ferguson v. Bradley Alan Ferguson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In re the Marriage of: Elizabeth Mary Ferguson v. Bradley Alan Ferguson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“[T]he interpretation of statutes and stipulations in dissolution judgments are questions of law, which we review de novo.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
In re the Marriage of: James Allen Ertl v. Diane Martha Ertl 871 N.W.2d 410 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-31 (Minn. App. 2008) ().
Colleen M. Doyle v. Keith R. Klein Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Colleen M. Doyle v. Keith R. Klein Minn. Ct. App. 2015
“A district court has broad discretion over issues of spousal maintenance, and generally we will not reverse a decision regarding maintenance absent an abuse of this discretion.” -31 (Minn. App. 2008), review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Terry John Hietpas v. Barbara Elizabeth Reed f/k/a Barbara Elizabeth Reed Hietpas Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Terry John Hietpas v. Barbara Elizabeth Reed f/k/a Barbara Elizabeth Reed Hietpas Minn. Ct. App. 2014
But a “label or title is not determinative.” review denied (Minn. Aug.
In re the Marriage of: Charles A. T. Gill v. Kathryn E. K. Gill Minn. Ct. App. 2014
In re the Marriage of: Charles A. T. Gill v. Kathryn E. K. Gill Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marriage of Gossman v. Gossman 847 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Marriage of Gossman v. Gossman 847 N.W.2d 718 Minn. Ct. App. 2014
review denied (Minn. Aug.
Nelson v. Nelson 806 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 2011
Nelson v. Nelson 806 N.W.2d 870 Minn. Ct. App. 2011