Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Brua v. MINNESOTA JOINT UNDERWRITING ASS'N, 778 N.W.2d 294.

141 citing documents.

In the Matter of the Administrative Order Issued to Moses Wazwaz, Individually, Allstate Construction, Inc., and A & … Minn. Ct. App. 2020
“If the meaning of a statute is unambiguous, [appellate courts] interpret the statute’s text according to its plain language.” See Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
In re the Matter of the Civil Commitment of: Matthew Lee DeRosia. Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n, see also Sela Inv.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
City of Baxter v. City of Brainerd 932 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
City of Baxter v. City of Brainerd 932 N.W.2d 477 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass'n , , 300 (Minn. 2010).
Olson v. Lesch 931 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Olson v. Lesch 931 N.W.2d 832 Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass'n , , 300 (Minn. 2010).
Lawrence Paul St. Marie, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“If the meaning of a statute is unambiguous, we interpret the statute’s text according to its plain language.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Green v. Kellen 921 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Green v. Kellen 921 N.W.2d 768 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass'n , , 300 (Minn. 2010).
In re the Marriage of: Dennis D. Dickinson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Amy Sue Denzer, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
If the language is clear , we must “interpret the statute’s text according to its plain language.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Ellis v. Doe 915 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Ellis v. Doe 915 N.W.2d 24 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass'n , , 300 (Minn. 2010).
State v. Atwood 914 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Atwood 914 N.W.2d 422 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Brua v. Minn. Joint UnderwritingAss'n , , 300 (Minn. 2010).
Lana Schulz, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Buskey v. Am. Legion Post 910 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2018
Buskey v. Am. Legion Post 910 N.W.2d 9 Minn. 2018
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass'n , , 297 (Minn. 2010).
A17-0903 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
If a statut e is ambiguous, we ap ply other canons of construction to discern the legislature’s intent.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n, (quota tion and citations omitted) .
In re Order Approving the Application by DG Minnesota CSG 2, LLC for a Conditional Use Permit Minn. Ct. App. 2017
See Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Gust G. Johanson, et al., Appellants, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
If the statute is ambiguous, we apply “other canons of construction to discern the legislature’s intent.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Johnson v. Princeton Public Utilities Commission 899 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Johnson v. Princeton Public Utilities Commission 899 N.W.2d 860 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Nathan Tow-Arnett, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Joint Underwriting Ass’n
In re the Marriage of: Joanna Brooks Benson, f/k/a Joanna Lee Brooks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
If a statute is ambiguous, we apply other canons of construction to discern the legislature’s intent.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n, (citation omitted).
In the MATTER OF the Application of J.M.M. O/B/O Minors for a Change of Name 890 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
In the MATTER OF the Application of J.M.M. O/B/O Minors for a Change of Name 890 N.W.2d 750 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
If we determine that the statute is ambiguous, we apply “other canons of construction to discern the legislature’s intent.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. v. Racheal L. Hooten f/k/a Racheal L. Jones 889 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Mobile Diagnostic Imaging, Inc. v. Racheal L. Hooten f/k/a Racheal L. Jones 889 N.W.2d 27 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“If the meaning of a statute is unambiguous, [an appellate court] interpret[s] the statute’s text according to its plain language.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
A-1 Construction, Inc., Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A-1 Construction, Inc., Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Danna Rochelle Back v. State of Minnesota 883 N.W.2d 614 Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. David Paul Patterson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“If the meaning of a statute is unambiguous, we interpret the statute’s text according to its plain language.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Guy Israel Greene v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Guy Israel Greene v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n
Ryan Contracting Company v. O'Neill & Murphy, LLP 868 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Ryan Contracting Company v. O'Neill & Murphy, LLP 868 N.W.2d 473 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n, (quotation and citations omitted).
Tracie Erickson, Relators v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Tracie Erickson, Relators v. Minnesota Department of Natural Resources Minn. Ct. App. 2015
If a statute is ambiguous, we apply other canons of construction to discern the legislature’s intent.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n, (citation omitted).
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michele Sykes v. Rochester City Council, City of Rochester Minn. Ct. App. 2015
.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n, d 294, 300 (Minn. 2010) (quotation and citations omitted).
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II … 860 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Melinda M. Binkley, Trustee on behalf of the heirs and next of kin of Kirk T. Lloyd, II … 860 N.W.2d 707 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
6 v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n, (quotation and citations omitted).
Gale Allen Rachuy v. Duluth Police Department Property Room Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Gale Allen Rachuy v. Duluth Police Department Property Room Minn. Ct. App. 2015
When interpreting statutes, we seek “to ascertain and effectuate the intention of the legislature.” Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n, (quotation omitted).
Sprinkler Warehouse, Inc. v. Systematic Rain, Inc., d/b/a GPLAWN.com 859 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Sprinkler Warehouse, Inc. v. Systematic Rain, Inc., d/b/a GPLAWN.com 859 N.W.2d 527 Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Brua v. Minn. Joint Underwriting Ass’n

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by