Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Raleigh, 778 N.W.2d 90.

860 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Mikulak 903 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 2017
State v. Mikulak 903 N.W.2d 600 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A defendant bears the burden of showing his plea was invalid.” State v. Raleigh
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A court must allow a defendant to withdraw an involuntary plea because withdrawal is “necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” State v. Raleigh
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Michael Dejaris Denson, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
D E C I S I O N “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
The purpose of the accuracy requirement is to “protect[] a defendant from pleading guilty to a more serious offense than that for which he could be convicted if he insisted on his right to trial.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
Brian Allen Barthel, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
Leanne Starr, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A district court must permit a defendant to withdraw a guilty plea “if wit hdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
Daniel Onguenyi Nyagoko, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
Dikken v. State 896 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2017
Dikken v. State 896 N.W.2d 873 Minn. 2017
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State v. Ellis-Strong 899 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Ellis-Strong 899 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Because ineffective assistance of counsel may render a plea constitutionally invalid, Sames, d at 567 , and “[a] manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid,” a guilty plea based on ineffective assistance of counsel creates a manifest injustice as a matter of law.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“[Appellate courts] review a district c ourt’s decision to deny a wit hdrawal motion for abuse of discretion, reversing only in the rare case.” State v. Raleigh , (quotation omitted).
State v. Montez 899 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Montez 899 N.W.2d 200 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
(requiring withdrawal when a plea is not accurate, voluntary, or intelligent).
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Clayton James Hanks, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Erasmo Monge Rauda, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A defendant does not have an “absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
State v. Brown 896 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Brown 896 N.W.2d 557 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Lester Leander Wiechmann, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Boecker 893 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 2017
State v. Boecker 893 N.W.2d 348 Minn. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Milton Joseph Budreau, III, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A defendant does not have an “absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A guilty plea is invalid if it is not “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017

Explore

Outcomes

Cited by