Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Raleigh, 778 N.W.2d 90.

864 citing documents.

State of Minnesota v. Ozell Ellis Lashaun Hardy Minn. Ct. App. 2018
However, “a court must allow withdrawal of a guilty plea if withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’” (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Geovany Gonzalez Bernia Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Jones 921 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Jones 921 N.W.2d 774 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Raleigh , , 94 (Minn. 2010).
State of Minnesota v. David James Jones Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Appella nt bears the burden of showing that his plea was invalid, but the validity of a plea is a question of law reviewed de nov o. State v. Raleigh
Louis Ambrose v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that [an appellate court] review[s] de no vo.” (citations omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Anne De Perry Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. David Joseph Madrigal Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A defendant has n o absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” State v. Raleigh , d 90, 93 (Minn. 2010).
State of Minnesota v. Zacharia Dahir Mohamed Minn. Ct. App. 2018
2, a defendant may withdraw a plea before sentencing “if it is fair and just to do so.”
State of Minnesota v. Isidro Carranza Minn. Ct. App. 2018
To be valid, a guilty plea must b e “accurate, voluntary, and in telligent.”
Charles Winston v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
1, which exists if a guilty plea is inaccurate, unintelligent, or involun tary, Dikken v. State, 7 ; State v. Raleigh , .
State of Minnesota v. Erica Marie Ruiz Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Melie Ike Ilogu Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. William H. Bushey, III Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Wayne Joseph Bosto Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
State of Minnesota v. Augustine Corona Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Elwin Louis Klimek Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid.” d 90, 94 (Minn. 2010).
Jennifer Natalie Bernard v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A guilty plea is valid if it is “accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Larry Donnell Griffin Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N I. Griffin contends that the district court “abused its discretion by denying [his] request for plea withdrawal where it would have been fair and just to allow him to face trial.” “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Mathew Erickson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” State v. Raleigh
State of Minnesota v. Todd Allan Wenner Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Justin Lee Armstrong Minn. Ct. App. 2018
[when] withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” A manifest injustice exists when the defendant establishes that his pl ea was “inaccurate, involuntary, or unintelligent.”
State of Minnesota v. Michael Travis Porter Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N I. “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” State v. Raleigh
State of Minnesota v. Robert Lee Ranzy Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
State of Minnesota v. Grant David Hendrickson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
First, a court must allow wit hdrawal of a guilty plea if withdrawal is necessary to correct a ‘manifest injustice.’” State v. Raleigh , (quoting Minn. R. Crim.
State of Minnesota v. Kevin Bernard Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Matthew Hong Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Rufus Cornelius Loyd v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Tanka Nath Upreti Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
Ulysses Michael Johnson v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Heather Marie Krumrie Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Guilty Plea “Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that we review de novo.”
State of Minnesota v. Timothy Thomas Ogris Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
State of Minnesota v. Harry Maddox, III Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Blake Andrew Dearmond Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“Assessing the validity of a plea presents a question of law that we review de novo.” State v. Raleigh
David Walt Studanski v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
Wheeler v. State 909 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2018
Wheeler v. State 909 N.W.2d 558 Minn. 2018
1463 , 25 L.Ed.2d 747 (1970) ("The voluntariness of [defendant's] plea can be determined only by considering all of the relevant circumstances surrounding it."); State v. Raleigh , , 96 (Minn. 2010) ("Whether a plea is voluntary is determined by considering all relevant circumstances.").
State of Minnesota v. Erik Charles Knutson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
A defendant must be allowed to withdraw a guilty plea if “withdrawal is necessary to correct a manifest injustice.” (quotation omitted).
Gideon Charles Arrington, II v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Renae Dawn Kramer Minn. Ct. App. 2018
“A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.”
In the Matter of the Welfare of: C. G. H., Child Minn. Ct. App. 2018
To be constitutionally valid, a guilty plea must be accurate, voluntary, and intelligent.” State v. Raleigh , (citation omitted).
State of Minnesota v. Jesse Russell Patchen Minn. Ct. App. 2018
4 D E C I S I O N “A defendant has no absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea after entering it.” State v. Raleigh
State of Minnesota v. Darrick James Bellecourt Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Scott Bradley Knutson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Cody Robert Schrock Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. David Carl Thompson Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State of Minnesota v. Ladena Pacheco Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State of Minnesota v. John James Jackson, Jr. Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“We review a district court’s decision to deny a withdrawal motion for abuse of discretion, reversing only in the ‘rare case.’” (quoting Kim v. State , ).
Matthew Roy Woller v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2017
1, 6 which “exists if a guilty plea is not valid ,” State v. Raleigh
State of Minnesota v. Thomas Kendricks, III Minn. Ct. App. 2017