Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peterson v. Northeast Bank—Minneapolis, 805 N.W.2d 878.
-
Allen Peterson v. Edward R. Shaw, PA, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Bank –Minneapolis, d 878, 883 (Minn. App. 2011) (applying Thiele to an unemployment -benefits appeal and declining to decide an issue that “was not raised before the ULJ”).
-
Shakitha Jones v. V & J Employment Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(stating appellate courts generally must consider “only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court” (quotation omitted)); (applying Thiele in an unemployment-benefits appeal).
-
Antonio F. Bragg v. Fairchild Equipment, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Bank Minneapoli s, (stating an issue that is “not raised before the ULJ, .
-
Steven A. Franklin v. C&C Logistics, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Bank-Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
- Kirstin Arneson v. St Cloud Auto Sales.Com LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
- Kirstin Arneson v. St Cloud Auto Sales.Com LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2026
-
Philljeral Glekiah v. Echosphere, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Bank-Minneapolis, (noting that an issue that is not raised to the ULJ “is not properly before this court on review”).
-
Teresa McDonald v. Monarch Bus Service, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Bank-Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
- In the Matter of the Calculation of MSRS General Employees Retirement Plan Annuity for Francisco Henderson Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-
Anne L Doering v. 2Care4U South, LLC, 4U Home Health Care South, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic …
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bank Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
-
Mary Chasteen v. Ind School District #2342, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bank-Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”); (“[A] party cannot complain about a district court’s failure to rule in [the party’s] favor when one of the reasons it did
-
Tyler Leibfried v. City of Duluth, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bank-Minneapolis, (applying Thiele in an unemployment-benefits appeal).
- Gregory M. Reinert v. Fairview Health Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-
Husen A. Guffe v. Wal-Mart Associates, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Bank-Minneapolis, (applying Thiele to an unemployment case).
-
Rachel Royer v. Inventiv Health, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Bank–Minneapolis, d 878, 883 (Minn. App. 2011) (applying Thiele in an unemployment benefits appeal).
-
Pamela Wilhelm v. Fairview Health Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bank-Minneapolis, d 878, 883 (Minn. App. 2011).
-
Maureen McCulloch v. William K. Swanstrom, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bank—Minneapolis, (applying Thiele in unemployment-benefits appeal and declining 13 to review an issue that a party failed to raise before the ULJ).
-
In the Matter of: Julie Heaver
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bank— Minneapolis, (applying Thiele in an unemployment-benefits appeal and declining to review an issue when DEED failed to raise the issue before the ULJ).
-
Teresa Ward v. Delta Airlines, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bank - 8 Minneapolis, (declining to review issue not considered by ULJ).1 DECISION The evidence supports the ULJ’s finding that Ward quit her employment.
-
Dianne Strohmayer v. A&E Care Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Bank—Minneapolis, (applying Thiele in an unemployment-benefits appeal).
-
Barbara Jacobson v. County of Dakota, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Bank—Minneapolis, (declining to review an issue not considered by a ULJ and noting the factual nature of the unemployment-benefits 5 analysis).
-
Bruce K. Rankila v. Fairview Health Services, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bank-Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
-
Ann R. Majerus v. Spartannash Associates, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bank – Mpls., (“[if] the issue was not raised before the ULJ, [then] it is not properly before this court”).
- Anthony Browne v. M. A. Mortenson Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- Anthony Browne v. M. A. Mortenson Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
- A-1 Construction, Inc. v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
A-1 Construction, Inc. v. Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
7 Bank–Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
- Sharon Anderson v. YUM Design, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Sharon Anderson v. YUM Design, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bank–Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
- Lee Xiong v. Water Gremlin Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Lee Xiong v. Water Gremlin Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Robert R. Adams v. Select Communications, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Robert R. Adams v. Select Communications, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Deborah A. Weckert v. United Healthcare Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Deborah A. Weckert v. United Healthcare Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Michael Robin v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
- Michael Robin v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014