Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Peterson v. Northeast Bank—Minneapolis, 805 N.W.2d 878.

36 citing documents.

Shakitha Jones, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
(stating appellate courts generally must consider “only those issues that the record shows were presented and considered by the trial court” (quotation omitted)); (applying Thiele in an unemployment-benefits appeal).
Antonio F. Bragg, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Bank Minneapoli s, (stating an issue that is “not raised before the ULJ, .
Steven A. Franklin, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Bank-Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
Kirstin Arneson, Relator v. St Cloud Auto Sales.Com LLC, Department of Employment and Economic ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Kirstin Arneson, Relator v. St Cloud Auto Sales.Com LLC, Department of Employment and Economic ... Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Philljeral Glekiah, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Bank-Minneapolis, (noting that an issue that is not raised to the ULJ “is not properly before this court on review”).
Teresa McDonald, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Bank-Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
In the Matter of the Calculation of MSRS General Employees Retirement Plan Annuity for Francisco Henderson. Minn. Ct. App. 2025
Anne L Doering, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bank Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
Mary Chasteen, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bank-Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”); (“[A] party cannot complain about a district court’s failure to rule in [the party’s] favor when one of the reasons it did
Tyler Leibfried, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2024
Bank-Minneapolis, (applying Thiele in an unemployment-benefits appeal).
Gregory M. Reinert, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Husen A. Guffe, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Bank-Minneapolis, (applying Thiele to an unemployment case).
Rachel Royer, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
Bank–Minneapolis, d 878, 883 (Minn. App. 2011) (applying Thiele in an unemployment benefits appeal).
Pamela Wilhelm, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bank-Minneapolis, d 878, 883 (Minn. App. 2011).
Maureen McCulloch, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bank—Minneapolis, (applying Thiele in unemployment-benefits appeal and declining 13 to review an issue that a party failed to raise before the ULJ).
In the Matter of: Julie Heaver. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bank— Minneapolis, (applying Thiele in an unemployment-benefits appeal and declining to review an issue when DEED failed to raise the issue before the ULJ).
Teresa Ward, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Bank - 8 Minneapolis, (declining to review issue not considered by ULJ).1 DECISION The evidence supports the ULJ’s finding that Ward quit her employment.
Dianne Strohmayer, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Bank—Minneapolis, (applying Thiele in an unemployment-benefits appeal).
Barbara Jacobson, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
Bank—Minneapolis, (declining to review an issue not considered by a ULJ and noting the factual nature of the unemployment-benefits 5 analysis).
Bruce K. Rankila, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Bank-Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
Ann R. Majerus, Relator, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Bank – Mpls., (“[if] the issue was not raised before the ULJ, [then] it is not properly before this court”).
Anthony Browne, Relator v. M. A. Mortenson Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Anthony Browne, Relator v. M. A. Mortenson Company, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2017
A-1 Construction, Inc., Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
A-1 Construction, Inc., Relator v. Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
7 Bank–Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
Sharon Anderson, Relator v. YUM Design, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Sharon Anderson, Relator v. YUM Design, LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Bank–Minneapolis, (“[B]ecause this issue was not raised before the ULJ, it is not properly before this court on review.”).
Lee Xiong, Relator v. Water Gremlin Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Lee Xiong, Relator v. Water Gremlin Co. (Corp.), Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Robert R. Adams, Relator v. Select Communications, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Robert R. Adams, Relator v. Select Communications, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Deborah A. Weckert, Relator v. United Healthcare Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Deborah A. Weckert, Relator v. United Healthcare Services, Inc., Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2015
Michael Robin, Relator v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014
Michael Robin, Relator v. BHSI LLC, Department of Employment and Economic Development Minn. Ct. App. 2014