Cited by
Opinions in Minnesota that cite Sames v. State, 805 N.W.2d 565.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
-68 (Minn. App. 2011), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
-
A24-1062
Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(“A defendant’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.” (citing Hill v. Lockhart, 474 U.S. 52, 56 (1985)).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2024
- 68 (Minn. App. 2011) , rev denied (Minn. Dec.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2023
“A defendant ’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.” rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
see also Raleigh, d at 94 (acknowledging that a “manifest injustice exists if a guilty plea is not valid”) .
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
possible effect that a plea may have upon a future charge is a collateral consequence that does not render the guilty plea unintelligent), rev. denied (Minn. May 21, 2013); (holding that the risk of becoming ineligible to possess a firearm is a collateral consequence of a guilty plea), rev. denied (Minn. May 26, 1999); - 69 (Minn. App. 2011) (reaffirming the holding in Rodriguez after the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Padilla v. Kentucky, 559 U.S. 356 (2010), which required attorneys
- State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
-
Tescil Romalis Mason-Kimmons, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A defendant’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.” Sames v. State , rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
“A defendant’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.” Sames v. State , rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
-
Jesus Daniel Ibarra, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Sames v. State , , rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
-
Dylan Matthew Deling, petitioner, Appellant,
Minn. Ct. App. 2021
First, Padilla is limited to “the unique nature of deportation” and does not extend to “any of the other myriad consequences of a guilty plea.” Sames v. State , -70 (Minn. Ap p. 2011) (declining to apply Padilla’s holding in unlawful-possession case), rev. denied (Minn. Dec.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
C.f. Sames v. State , (holding that ineligibility to possess a firearm is a collateral conse quence of a conviction because it is civil and regulatory in nature and a defendant need not be aware of this consequence to plead guilty to an offense) , review denied (Minn. Dec.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
Under Strickland’s first prong, petitioner must show 5 that counsel’s performance “fell below an objective standard of reasonableness.” (quoting Staunton v. State , d 289, 300 (Minn. 2010)) (citing Strickland, 466 U.S. at 688, 104 S. Ct. at 206 4).
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A defendant’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.” Sames v. State
- , A17-1281 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A defendant’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.” Sames v. State , review denied (Minn. Dec.
- State v. Ellis-Strong 899 N.W.2d 531 Minn. Ct. App. 2017
-
State v. Ellis-Strong
899 N.W.2d 531
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“A defendant’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if the *536 defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.” (Minn.App.
-
State of Minnesota, Respondent,
Minn. Ct. App. 2017
It follows that “[a] defendant’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if th e defendant received ineffectiv e assistance of counsel.”
- State of Minnesota v. Omar Taha Yaseen Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Omar Taha Yaseen
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Whether that distinction is appropriate is a question we need not consider in this case because of the unique nature of deportation.”); but see 6 (declining to extend Padilla beyond deportation into the context of firearm possession, a collateral consequence); Crump, d at 843 (declining to extend Padilla into the context of potential future driving-while-intoxicated pleas).
- Desmon Demond Burks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- Desmon Demond Burks v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
- State of Minnesota v. Larry Lee Hough Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Larry Lee Hough
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
Hough also contends that his “guilty plea is invalid as involuntary and unintelligent because he pleaded guilty based on ineffective assistance of counsel.” “A defendant’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.” review denied 10 (Minn. Dec.
- Theodore Lee Wicken v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Theodore Lee Wicken v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea.”
- State of Minnesota v. Gonsalo Cosme-Garsia Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
State of Minnesota v. Gonsalo Cosme-Garsia
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A defendant’s guilty plea may be constitutionally invalid if the defendant received ineffective assistance of counsel.”
- Jaime Marquez Guevara v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-
Jaime Marquez Guevara v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“A defendant does not have an absolute right to withdraw a guilty plea.”
- Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Junious Taylor, Jr. v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
See, (declining to extend Padilla beyond deportation into the context of firearm possession, a collateral consequence).
- Lynell Richard Ellison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Joshua Zachary Matter v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
- Lynell Richard Ellison v. State of Minnesota Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-
Joshua Zachary Matter v. State of Minnesota
Minn. Ct. App. 2015
-70 (Minn. App. 2011) (ruling that Padilla does not require an attorney to advise a client that a guilty plea may result in the client’s ineligibility to possess a firearm).
- State v. Crump 826 N.W.2d 838 Minn. Ct. App. 2013
-
State v. Crump
826 N.W.2d 838
Minn. Ct. App. 2013
“[A] guilty plea is valid if a defendant is aware of the direct consequences of pleading guilty.”