Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite Schowalter v. State, 822 N.W.2d 292.

24 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2026
Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children v. State of Minnesota, ... Minn. 2023
Alejandro Cruz-Guzman, as guardian and next friend of his minor children v. State of Minnesota, ... Minn. 2023
The element of intent, therefore, (explaining that a justiciable controversy requires “a genuine conflict in tangible interests between adverse parties”).
In re the Matter of Joseph Rued, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
-99 (Minn. 2012) (stating that justiciable controversy requires, among other things, “genuine conflict .
Dr. Jane Doe, et al., Respondents, Minn. Ct. App. 2023
do not ‘decide cases merely to establish precedent.’” 3 Schowalter v. State , ().
Minn. 2023
Schowalter v. State , d 292, 300 (Minn. 2012).
Minn. 2022
We do not issue opin ions “merely to establish precedent.” Schowalter v. State , ( 6 (Minn. 1989)).
A21-0403 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
Nor do we “decide cas es merely to establish precedent.” (quotation omitted).
Deklin Darren Goeden, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
St. Cloud Educational Rights Advocacy Council, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2020
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Phone Recovery Servs., LLC v. Qwest Corp. 919 N.W.2d 315 Minn. 2018
Cf. Schowalter v. State , , 305 (Minn. 2012) (Page, J., dissenting) (noting that "tax revenues include taxes of 'state wide application on any class of property, income, transaction or privilege' " (quoting Minn. Const. art. XI, § 4 ) ).
Cruz-Guzman v. State 916 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2018
Cruz-Guzman v. State 916 N.W.2d 1 Minn. 2018
In other words, although the constitution assigns to the Legislature the duty of establishing "a general and uniform system of public schools," Minn. Const. art. XIII, § 1, the interpretation of the constitution's language "is a judicial, not a legislative, question," Schowalter v. State , , 301 (Minn. 2012).
In re the Matter of Dahlgren Township, City of Carver and the Commissioner of the Office of Administrative … Minn. Ct. App. 2017
Honorable Galen J. Vaa, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
City of Golden Valley v. Wiebesick 899 N.W.2d 152 Minn. 2017
Bicking v. City of Minneapolis 891 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2017
Bicking v. City of Minneapolis 891 N.W.2d 304 Minn. 2017
We “require the presence of a justiciable controversy as essential to our exercise of jurisdiction.” see also Onvoy, Inc. v. ALLETE, Inc., (explaining that a justiciable controversy exists when a claim presents “definite and concrete assertions of right that emanate from a legal source,” “a genuine conflict in tangible interests between parties with adverse interest
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
In Re the GUARDIANSHIP OF Jeffers J. TSCHUMY, Ward 853 N.W.2d 728 Minn. 2014
The case on which the dissent re lies — — therefore is inapposite.
State of Minnesota v. Brian Jeffrey Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2014
State of Minnesota v. Brian Jeffrey Copeland Minn. Ct. App. 2014
(“[W]e do not issue advisory opinions.”).
State v. M.D.T. 831 N.W.2d 276 Minn. 2013