Cited by

Opinions in Minnesota that cite State v. Peter, 825 N.W.2d 126.

86 citing documents.

State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(stating that this court is bound by its precedential decisions), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Isaac Gutierrez Minn. Ct. App. 2025
State of Minnesota v. Isaac Gutierrez Minn. Ct. App. 2025
(“For the reasons D-10 just discussed, those additional characteristics of [defendant’s] relative youth, his family support, his lack of a prior felony record, and his ability to obtain meaningful employment and education are not bases on which
Followed State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
10, 2021); rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
Followed State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2025
10, 2021); State v. Peter , rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Raenard Romalle Douglas Minn. Ct. App. 2024
State of Minnesota v. Raenard Romalle Douglas Minn. Ct. App. 2024
10, 2021); rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
8 departures,” and “age and lack of a felony record are not valid bases for durational departures.” ( and Bauerly, d at 762), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2022
But as the state correctly asserts, just as the district court did not have the authority to overrule precedential opinions, see State v. Peter , rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
In the Matter of the Welfare of: J. C. L., Child. Minn. Ct. App. 2022
10, 2021); State v. Peter , rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
A21-0480 Minn. Ct. App. 2022
See State v. Peter , -30 (Minn. App. 2012), rev. denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
T his court has similarly stated that its published opinions are binding on this court and on the district courts.2 See, review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2021
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
See, review denied (Minn. Feb.
In re the Marriage of: Lauri Sue Browning, petitioner, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
1; , 129 (Minn. App. 2012), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
“A district court has broad discretion to depart from the sentencing guidelines, and 5 [this court] review[s] its decision to depart for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2019
review denied (Minn. Feb.
A17-1995 Minn. Ct. App. 2018
State v. Peter , review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
D E C I S I O N “A district court has broad discretion to depart from the sentencing guidelines, and [this court] review[s] its decision to depart for an abuse of discretion.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
review denied (Minn. Feb.
650 North Main Association, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See, review denied (Minn. Feb.
Followed Daryll Christian Strom, petitioner, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
See, review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Appellant, Minn. Ct. App. 2018
(“Requests for durational departures require the district court to consider whether the conduct involved in the offense of conviction was significantly more or less serious than the typical conduct for that crime.”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
“Requests for durational departures require the 4 district court to consider whether the conduct involved in the offense of conviction was significantly more or less serious than the typical conduct for that crime .” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota, Respondent, Minn. Ct. App. 2017
State v. Peter , , review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Kim Ronnie Blatcher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Kim Ronnie Blatcher Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Substantial and compelling circumstances are those that make the case atypical.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Dennis Ervin Carter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Dennis Ervin Carter Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Adam Wallace Jaunich Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Adam Wallace Jaunich Minn. Ct. App. 2016
-31 (Minn. App. 2012), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Abigail Rae Trulson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Abigail Rae Trulson Minn. Ct. App. 2016
3 (“Caselaw is settled that offender-related factors do not support durational departures.”), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Bailey Jordan Garcia Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Corey Michael Kokette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Corey Michael Kokette Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Bailey Jordan Garcia Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Harrison William Rund Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Harrison William Rund Minn. Ct. App. 2016
d 126, 130 (Minn. App. 2012) (enumerating offender-related factors such as remorse, clean 6 record, offender’s youth, family support, and offender’s ability to obtain education and employment), review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Eric Toney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Eric Toney Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Allen Maurice Moffett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Allen Maurice Moffett Minn. Ct. App. 2016
In order to depart from the presumptive sentence, the district court “must identify substantial and compelling reasons why the departure sentence is more appropriate than the presumptive sentence.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Rico Patrick Howard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Rico Patrick Howard Minn. Ct. App. 2016
review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Zaki Mohamed Sugule Minn. Ct. App. 2016
State of Minnesota v. Zaki Mohamed Sugule Minn. Ct. App. 2016
“Requests for durational departures require the district court to consider whether the conduct involved in the offense of conviction was significantly more or less serious than the typical conduct for that crime.” review denied (Minn. Feb.
State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Triell Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2015
State of Minnesota v. Isaiah Triell Hall Minn. Ct. App. 2015
review denied (Minn. Feb.